In a criminal appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC, the High Court set aside the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the appellant, as the entire loss was already paid and no similar cases existed, while leaving the fine unaltered and discharging bail bonds.
Sentence of imprisonment set aside; fine remains unaltered; bail bonds discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t
BAIL SLIP : The Petitioner/ Accused was directed to be released on bail bv the orderof the High Court dated.21 .04.2010 in Crl.A.M,p t{o.eO5oi2Orb-in-'' - Crl.A.No.608 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APP EAL NO 608 0F 2010
Appeal under section 374(2) of cr.p.c aggrieved by the Judgment dated 15.04.2010 passed in Aprs cc.1 of 2004 on-tie fire of the r noir. session, Judge, Nizamabad
Between:
Mohd lrhad,-S/o. Mr Abdul -Waheed, -Business, Lessee of flour Mill, Oil Mill and Fluller, R/o. 8-16, tstampur, rotagir d&M), NiiJmi6a-Jbistrict.
AND
...APELLANT(S)
state of A'P. Represented by its pubric prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderdbad.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Gounsel for the Appellant: SRl. K DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent: pUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPDAL No.6O8OF 2O1O
JUDGMENT:
This Criminai Appeaiisfiled questioning the judgment in APTS. C.C. No.). of2OO4 dated15'04'2010 passed by the learnedIAdditionalSessionsJudge, Nrjamabad.
, I
2
Miscellaleous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
&'
To,
tT II I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 30/06/2023
JUDGTt,IENT
CRLA.No.608 of 2010
'{ g:iTAf(: LlA
-;<br>li
I -)o 1\ []s $B
Lr
, )EilP$!'r."-'
-
PARTLY ALLOWING
. THE CRIMINAL APPEAL
a
G)er
$tr
a3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence imposed in the trial court judgment under challenge should be set aside.
Whether the Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of CrPC should be partly allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Irhad
State of A'P.
K. SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
