vide returned memos dated 01.12.2OlO on their presentation through HDFC Bank, Secunderabad for the reason of insufficient funds'. Accordingly, after issuance of legal notices dated 30. I I .2010 informing the said dishonour and calling upon the petitioner to repay the said hand loan amount and in view of non-response on the part of the petitioner in spite of receipt of the said legal notices, the 1st respondent got registered CC Nos. 189 of 2011 and l9O of 2Ol7 before the learned XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, which were transferred and renumbered as CC No.64 of 2Ol2 and 65 of 2Ol2 respectively on the hle of learned XII Special Magistrate, Hyderabad, which Court, upon consideration of evidence available on record in the form of PWl, DWs.1 to 3, Exs.Pl to P12 and Exs.D1 to D4 in CC No.65 of 2Ol2 and PWl, DWs. 1 to 3, Exs.Pl to PlO and Exs.Dl to D4 in CC No.65 of 2012, found the petitioner/ accused in both the cases not guilty and acquitted under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C. for the oflence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. Learned appellate Court vide judgments dated 26. 11.2014 in Criminal Appeal Nos.1034 of 2Ot2 arrd 1033 of 2072, preferted against CC Nos.64 ot 2Ol2 and 65 of 2072 respectively, set aside/reversed the said findings of the learned trial Court, found the petitioner guilt5r, convicted and sentenced him, in both the cases, as stated supra.
