IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3208 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2272 oF 2010
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 & 401 of CrpC against the order in M.C.No. 253 of 2OOA dated 17-07-2010 on the fite of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy Districl at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.
Between:
ryll.yasaTulasidhar, Habsiguda,S/o. lvlr. SambasivaRao R/o. Flat No. 202, S.V.Residency, Street No. 8, Snehanagar Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.
... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
(respondent no. 3 being minor, rep.by her natural guardian
... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
CRLRCMP. NO : 3401 0F 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order passed in M.C.No. 253 of 2OO8 daled 17-07-2010 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. before this Hon'ble Court.
CRLRCMP. NO: 1655 OF 2011
Petitrorr u rder Section 151 CPC praying that rn the circurrstances stated in the affic avit f e(i in support of the petition, the High Cor- rt ma y be pleased to extend the trnre Jrantedin Ordersdated 10.12.2O1Oin Crl.tll.P.No.3401 ot2O1O in Crl.R.C No 2l 7 r'. of 2010 on the file of this Hon'ble Co.rrt for depositing the 50% of mr:inten rnce amount granted in M-C,No.253 of 2(,0t1 orr the file of the Judge Fanrily Cr urt, R.R.District,
Counsel for the)etitioners: SRl. T NAGARJUNA REDDY
Counsel for tlre ?espondent No. 2 to 3: SRICHARAN TELAPFIOLU
Counsel for the lespondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT.IUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
Crl.R.C.No.2272 OF 2010
ORDER:
l,eamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject
matter of criminal revision case has become infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, in this criminal
revision shall stand closed.
Sd/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIO FFICER
To,
pr \ V- DL
i !
r i I I t I i I I I
HIGH COU RT DATED:03 0312023
ORDER
CRLRC.N( .2272 of 2010
i"
: ,.'.
/. :,-
'\ ir 'f"N ?SI1
DISMISSE ) THE CRL.RC AS INFRU ]TUOUS
(D ..\ ab
k
Vasa Tulasidhar
State of A.P.
Smt. Vasa Sravani
Kum. Vasa Lakshmi Satwika
Justice P. Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
