Dismissed

Sidhur Raj Kiran v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Jul 2023CRLRC/2152/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad considered two Criminal Revision petitions under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. regarding Family Court orders. The court observed that the Civil Revision Petition shows prejudice because the filed amount was desired to be maintained. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case was dismissed to expedite the disposal of the main case by the trial court. Other pending applicati

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of Criminal Revision Case No. 2152 of 2018 with direction to the trial court to dispose of the main case expeditiously.

Sidhur Raj Kiran Vs The State of Telangana — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY HE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2152OF 2018

¶7

Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the Order dated 05.06.2018 made in F.C.O.P.No. 4 o'f 2016 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, at Adilabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sidhur Raj Kiran, S/o. Late Bapu Rao, Age: 30 years, Occ: Govt Emptoyee, Rl/o. Kolipura, Adilabad, Adilabad District.

¶10

AND

¶11

...PET]TIONER

¶12

l. the State of Telangana, Rep.by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana and The State of Andhra Pradesh

¶13

Sidhur Manjula, Wo. Sidhur Raj Kiran, Age: 30 years, Occ: Household, '1-4-59, Near Hanuman Temple, Ravindranagar, Adilabad, Adilabad District.

¶14

Sidhur Eshavi, Mainor, D/o. Sidhur Raj Kiran, Age: 3 years, Occ: Minor, 1-4-59, Near Hanuman Temple, Ravindranagar, Adilabad, Adilabad District. (Respondent No.3 is minor under the guardianship of her natural mother i.e. respondent No.2)

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶17

Petition under Section 397(1) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Orderdated 05-06-20'18 in F.C.O.P No.4 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Judge Family Court, Adilabad.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri R. MANGULAL

¶19

Counsel for Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶20

Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Sri RAVI KIRAN REDDY, rep. Sri S.

¶21

SURENDER REDDY

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HO {oURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENI)ER

¶24

CRIMIN AL REVISION CASE No.2152 OF :2Cr18

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Mr.Ravr Kirzrn Rr:dcl1., learned coun;cl rel ,re:jentrng Mr.S.Surrcndcr Redcll', lcarncrl counscl appr: rrirrg for respondent \r';,2 and 3/ri'ifc arrd the child u,ould submit that though th s Court l)assed order on 09.08.20 [ti directrng the petit.on€'r to pa.\ an .lnrount o[ Rs 4, J( )O/ and Rs.2,0007' [-) he rr,ife :tnd child respectivch, rto 1; rvrnent is being mar:c

¶27

lror r iol:r ir,n o[ thc orc]e rs passed bv this L rut t, t)'ris Criminal R:,i s ol Citst' ls liarbl<: to br: r rsrtissr:d Accordrnglr, rt r:; rlisntisstd. It rs necdless [o s,], t]rat the trial Court sha I disposc of thc main case as expel riousl, irs possible'

¶28

Nl^jsct'llitt- '(,us afJl)licilitons ltcnding, rl any s tall star-rd

¶29

clo sed

¶30

¶31

Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY(B'EGISrRAR //TRUE coPY,

¶32

SiECNON OFFICER

¶33

To, 1. The Judge, I:a rr y Court, at Adilabad . 2. One CC ro tirr i'IVANGULAL, Advocate IOPUCI 3 One CC to Sri ;. SURENDER REDDY, A.juo"rt" f,lpUCt

¶34

Two ccs to thr F'ubric prosecutor, High court ioi itie staie of T-erangana at Hyderabad. ,O l'1 )

¶35

Two CD t--o[,ie

Njb PR^c\t

HIGH COURT

KS,J

DATED:19107 2023

ORDER

-"---
' c 5tert .J
/ ,,t r i'.
/'; '
('lt, .. NB
11, \Nb
,|/
//
a::i:

¶42

CRLRC.No.2152 of 2018

¶43

DISMISSING THE I]RLRC.

¶44

@ro5owv

Sidhur Raj Kiran v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sidhur Raj Kiran v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arpula Shiva , Arpula Shiva Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Chellu Sai Nishanth Vs The State of Telangana

Shanta Kumari Kommavarapu Vs The State of Telangana

N.Rajesh Vs Smt. N.Rekha

Shaik Latheef Sab Vs The State of Telangana

Khaja Aijaz Vs Aliya Sultana