One- and two-line order disposing of a Criminal Petition seeking quash of proceedings. The Court held that the complaint involves matrimonial issues and the police could not coerce a party. The petition was disposed of without detailed reasoning.
Criminal petition in Cr.No. 1111 of 2023 disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32sl ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6401 oF 2023
Between:
AND
Petition under section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crimihar peiition, the iign c"rrt ;"v o" pleased to carr for the reco.rds rerating to FIR No.134 of 2023 on the fire of women Police Station, Begumpet. Hyderabad-and quash thl same.
l.A. NO:1 oF 2023
Petition under section !92 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalFeiition, the High-C;; ;;;i" plea-sed to dispense with in firing rhe certified .ofy or the'Frn rrri,liei?)ozi l, the file of Womenpotice Station, Begump"t, ivO.ilOrO.
l.A. NO:2 oF 2023
Petition under section _492 0t cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar'Feiition, the iiJn c"ri'rlv L" pleased. to stay ail further .pro-ceedings incruding arrest of the petitioners in connection with FrR No-134 of 202{ on the frr"e of women p6ri."-sirtio". Begumpet, Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri D BHASKAR REDDY, Advocate for the petitioners and the Addi pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No..l and of None appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
cRIMINALPE UaI-oI,IiU9.,64qLqE 2oZ 3
ORDER:
This Crimi.nalPetitior-r is filed underSection482 of the Code ofCriminai Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr'P'C ') by the petitioners /Accttsed Nos l to 3 toquash the proceedings againstthem in Crtme No 1ll'1 of 2023 pending on the llle of WomenPoliceStation, Begumpet, Hyderabad. The offences urrcl'':rSections498-A and 5O6 r lw' 34 alleged againstthem 'rre of IPC
would submitthat 3. Learnedcounselfor tlle pe tittoners the noticeunder Section4 1 -A hasbeen issued and explanationr,r as alsogiveI r ll-r the pctitioncrs Llowever'the Police areintimidatingllrepetitioners intoenteringa MemorandumofUnderstanding (MOU) with the wife for divorce.The issues arc bel q'centhe spouses and the Police cannot enterirlto said issut,:s coercingone of the parties to enter into MOU.Thcrelbre. the Policeshall not call the
petitioners herein under the garb of investigation to the police Station
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// {iP
To,
sEcTtoN oFFICER
BJLB \V
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410712023
,4=='=
. l
I
s -tI
t
s' i.
s {
<br>: ..' // gtll * n
ORDdR
CRLP.No.6401 ot 2023
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
-+ 1>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal petition to quash proceedings under Sections 498-A and 506 IPC should be allowed given police intimidation allegations.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Chellu Sai N.ishanth
Devakar Prabhakar
Ushar Rani
The State of Telangana
Dr. V. yphnavi
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
