Sunkara Subba Rao v. the State of A.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed criminal revision by Sunkara Subba Rao challenging conviction for cheque dishonour under Section 138 NI Act. Court upheld lower courts findings as accused failed to prove debt was not legally enforceable.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision case dismissed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
BAIL SLIP: The Petitioner/AppellanUAccused was directed to be released on Bail by the Order of the High Court Dated: 05-02-2010 in Crl RC. MP: 313/2010 in Crl.RC.:210/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 210 OF 2010
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment daled. 02-02-2010 in Crl.A.No. 268 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the lll Additional [/etropolitan Session Judge, Hyderabad against Judgment dated:'1208-2009 in C.CNo. 134/09 on the file of XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVlll Additional Chief Metropolitan [/agistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
Sunkara Subba Rao S/o Late S. Venkaiah, Aged about 56years, Occ: Exserviceman Rl/o H.No.5-7114, Suryanagar Colony, Old Alwal, Secunderabad.
...PETITION ER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether accused who failed to prove legally enforceable debt is entitled to criminal revision.
Whether issuance of cheques for another transaction exempts accused from liability under Section 138.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunkara Subba Rao
- respondent
The State of A.P.
- respondent
V. Murugappa Chetty
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRC/210/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court