A criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 CrPC against an interim maintenance order was dismissed as infructuous, as the main Criminal M.P. had been dismissed.
Criminal revision case dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2s9e ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2049 OF 2010
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Revision filed under Section 3971401 of CrpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminaiRevisioncase,..;1 . the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the orders dated Bth September 2010 in MC No. 374 of 2OO8, passed by the Hori,ble Judge, Famity Court, Rangii Reedy District, the petitioenr beg to submit the present revision case on the following grounds within the time of limitation.
l.A. NO: 1OF 20 1 0(c RLRCMP. NO: 3010 OF 201 0
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders dated 08-09-2OlO, passed by Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reedy District, in MC No. 374 ot 2OOg
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. K NARSI REDDY
Gounsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SMTJUSTICEP.SREE SUDHA CRIMINALREVISION CASEN0.20,490F 2010
ORDER:
Learned counselfor the petitioner stated that this Criminal RevisionCase is preferred against the interim maintenance order.Inthe meanwhile, the main Crl.M.P.No.3010of 2010 in Crl'R'C'No'2O49of 2010 is dismissed.Therefore, CriminalRevisioncasels dismissed asinfructuous.
2 Recording thesaid submission, the Criminal
RevisionCase is dismissedas infructuous'There shall
be no order asto costs
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUW REGISTRAR l,A
SECTION OFFICER
To,
kam
AN}-
-1
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 010212023
i
3 1 tilt ?$?:
ORDER
A"f
CRLRC.No.2049 of 2010
THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Cr<)
)s {rr"
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow a criminal revision filed under Section 397 CrPC against an interim maintenance order.
Whether to make an order for costs in a case dismissed as infructuous.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
E. Ramachandra Rao
The State of A.P. Rep. by P.P.
Smt. Durga Sujatha
Master Laxmi Sai Prabhu
Dr. Justice P. Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
