The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Revision Case No. 1934 of 2009 as infructuous because the petitioners submitted that the underlying matter had become intractable. Costs were reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s9 I
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THEFIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISIONCASENO: 1934OF 2009
CriminalRevisionCaseunderSection3gT&4o1ofcr.P.CinC.C.103/2009against tn" irJgr"ntdated1 9/10/2009 made in cvmp125112009on the fite of the court of in" xf X"nAaitionalChief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad'
Between:
AND
...RE',.NDENT/..MPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
CR CM N z 271 7 0F2009
Petition underSection397(1) Cr'P'C praylgthat in the circumstances stated in ttretvtemorandumof Oto'ndtof Criminat Revision Case' the High Court may bepleasedto grant stay att tutttrer.proceedings..including appearance of the ;"4;;d'i; C.C.t{olrogtZoo'g-on the file of the XIX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, HYderabad.
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRIANANDREP' SRI'P NAGENDRA REDDY ;;;;;;i iorttre Respondent1: sRl cH SHYAM SUNDER RAo il;;;i ior the Respondent2: PUBLICPRoSEcUToR it " Cou.t madetheiollowing:ORDER
t
THE HC NOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGI.F:JUN
CRIMI {AL REVISION CASE No.1934 of 1lOO9
ORDEB
This Jrir rrnal Revision Czrse is filed by the petitirners / accused undc: Section 397 (1) and 401 of tirr: Criminal Procedure Co< e. aggrieved by the Orders ciated 19.10.2009 passccl rn(lrl. 4 P.No.l251 of 2009 in C.C.No.lOi,,rf 2009 b1' the learne,l ) I)i Additional Chief MetropolitarL l,Iagistrate, Hvd e rab aC
O'2. Wh :n the matter has been taken rLp f:,r hearing, leerned coLlns, I lor the petitioners submittec that tnis matter has becomr: in nrctuous.
04 . Acc ;r dingly, this Criminal Revision C,ese is
dismissed eLs ir fi-uctuous. There is no order as to c:osts;.
As a s;eqr ei, pending Miscellaneous Applicatlrtas, if any,
shall stand clo red.
\
SD/.I. NAGALAKSHMI DE,PUN/ REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// I
Sf:CTION OFFICER
To,
EDS
s
HIGH COURI
DATED:01 102t2023
ORDER
,a' -:t'-' :.: i,\i {:,
-)'
-
il \ s r?fl ?ti?}
l.
CRLRC.No.I! 34 of 2009
DISMISSING..HE CRLRC WITHOUT COS}]TS
@)'qq &*" e\3,3
M/s. Amareswar Agrotech Ltd.
S. Rao
K.V. Srinivasa Rao
M/s. A.P. State Seeds Dev. Corpn. Ltd.
State of Andhra Pradesh
D. NagArjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
