The criminal revision filed by the accused was summarily dismissed by the High Court as it had become infructuous. No order as to costs.
Criminal Revision Case No.1932 of 2009 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1932 OF 2009
Revision filed under Sections 397(1) & 401 ot Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the Orders dated 19-10-2009, made in Crl.MP.No. 1248 of 2009 in C.C.No.101 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
CRLRCMP. NO: 2715 OF 2009
Petition under Section 397(1) of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings including appearance of the accused in C.C.No.'101/2009, on the file of the XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case.
Counsel for the Peti ioners : Sri ANAND rep. Sri P. NAGEI!t)Rl, REDDY Counsel for the Res )ondent No.1 : Sri CH. SHYAM SUNDEIT llAo
Counsel for the Rr:s rondent No.2 : ADDITIONAL PUBLIC Pll()SECUTOR The Court made the 'ollowing: ORDER
II
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISTON CASE No.1932 of 2OO9
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioners / accused under Section 397 (1) and 401 of the Crimina-l Procedure Code, aggrieved by the Orders dated 19.10.2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1.248 of 2OO9 in C.C.No.lOl of 2OO9 by the learned XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any,
sha-ll stand closed.
Sd/- M. MANJULA DEPUWREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIO OFFICER
To
Njb k*
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 102t2023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1932 of 2009
;=
a 'i" ,..- iA Ii.
/
.I
13 ,ji;ii 2m
'.i
.:
. \ :' ." ,. , 1|, -,1 .i-.,,!
. aF+r_-.::: _
DISMISSING I HE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFIIUCTUOUS.
'>
$.\2.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order requires to be revisited under Sections 397(1) and 401 of Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Amareswara Agri-Tech Limited
K.Giridhar
K.Prasad
M/s. A.P.state seeds dev. Corpn. Limited
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dr. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
