A criminal revision filed to challenge the dismissal of an appeal against an interim maintenance order was dismissed because the High Court found unsupported and unconvincing reasons for the delay in filing the appeal.
Disallowed the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the criminal revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s1 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
t.A.NO.2 0F 2018
IN/ AND
CRIMINAL REVISI ON CASE NOi 17240F 201A
criminal Revision case under section 397 & 401 of cr.p.c against the Judgment dated 1010912013 made in crt.Mp No.385/2013 on the file of the court of the Metropolitan sessions Judge, cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
Between:
Vamshee K.&yrr_t, @ {gyyqru Vamshee Krishna, S/o. Surender Rao, Occ: unemployee, R/o Flat No.4303a ilr Froor, Janapriya utopia Apts, il phase, Attapur Rajendranagar Nagar Mandal, RR District.
...PETITlONER/ PETITIONER/ APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
For the Petitioner : SRI M.V.PRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate
For the Respondents :
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE lIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
I.A.NO.2 of 2018IN/AND CRIM TNAL REVISION CASE No.l7 24 0l:t 2018
COMM ON OR )ER :
This crimi rar Revision case is fired under s,ectiorrs 397 ancr 40i of the Code of Crir rinalprocedure, 1973 (for short,Cr.p. l, ). ,rggrreved by the order date, r 10.09.2013 passed in crl.M.p.No.3tr5 cf 2013 in D.V.C.No.1a of 2lI3 by the learned Metropolitan tvlagistrate. Cyberabad, L.B. Nagar, Ranq, I lleddy District.
I I
_.j
days in filing the appeal, is dismissed and consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is also dismissed.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
\
To
Sd/-M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPYII @ SECTION OFFICER
Kj
q
g
HIGHCOURT
DATED:14/06/202:r
ORDER
|.A.NO.20F 201 i IN/ AND CRLRC.No.1724of 2018
/,i* i3E sIat5
7
,t
) 1g tl]t ?trll 1r ),cl// I
.'//
- . .. lt ,t1!,,'.' .,-''),-i/'/
-,?
- -.::-- -'
DISMISSINGT {E' CRL.R.C. .0
0{tt'
@
t,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal, primarily due to the petitioner being abroad, warrants condonation.
Whether the Lower Court's dismissal of the condonation application and consequent criminal revision requires interference.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vamshee Krishna
Abhilasha Kovuru
The State of Telangana
K.SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
