Allowed

M/S. Pratyankara Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anothers v. the State of Ap.,Rep by Its P.P and Anothers

Telangana HC10 Oct 2023CRLRC/1544/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed four Criminal Revision cases and acquitted the petitioners of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The acquittal was based on a compromise reached post-conviction between the accused and the complainant, supported by the legal precedent of Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal.

What did the court decide?

Revision petitions allowed; judgments under Sections 129, 126, 127 and 128 of 2010 and Criminal Appeals Nos. 365, 363, 364 and 366 of 2010 set aside; petitioners acquitted of the offence punishable un

M/S. Pratyankara Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anothers Vs… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRL.R.C.Nos: 1553 1544 1555 and 1556 OF 2011

¶6

COMMON C.T. lN ALL CRL.R.Cs :

¶7

Between:

¶8

'I . M/s Pratyankara Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, A.Mahesh Raju, S/o Venkatapathi, erla 50 yrs., Occ Business, Rl/o Plot No.60, Siddhartha Nagar, Vengalaraonagar, Hyderabad.

¶9

A.Mahesh Raju, S/o Venkatapathi, Business R/o Plot No.60, Siddhartha Nagar, Vengalaraonagar, Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 &2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of A.P., Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶13

Gurucharan Singh, S/o late Sardar Nanda Singh Bagga, Business R/o Plot No.400, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPON DENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶15

CRL.R.C.No.1553 of 2011 :

¶16

Criminal Revision Case U/s 397 & 4O1 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No.365 ot 2O1O dated 07.07.2011 on the file of the lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgment made in C.C.No.189 of 2010 dated 01.10.2010 on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional Judge Cum XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶17

CRL.R.C.M.P. NO:2241 OF 2011

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the Judgment dated 01.10.2010 passed in C.C.No.129 of 2010 on the file of the XVI Addl. Judge cum XX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in the interest of^justice.

¶19

CRL.R.C .M P. NO: 394 10F 2017 Between

¶20

Gurucharan Singh, S/o late Sardar. Nanda Singh Bagga, Business tVo plot No_400, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad "

¶21

...PETITIONER

¶22

AND

¶23

M/s Pratyankara Electronics pvt. Ltd., Rep. by- its Managing Director, A.lMahesh Raiu. S/o Venkatapathi,-alg-5d y;;:,"O#Busrness, R:/o ptot No.6O, S idd ha rtha Nasa r, _Vengala rabnagii, iid-d;-dil^""'

¶24

^ z. A.Manestr t-<atu, S/o Venkatapathi, Eiusiness Rl/o plot No.60, Siddhartha

¶25

^^{LrS{,Vt:ngalaraonagar,HyOeiaOid.} " ll!n",.ff,.ilJ5f?rtil.S:3*sented^{bv its Public Prosecutor,Hish court} or

¶26

...RESPONDENTS

¶27

Petition under section 'r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim Orders granted in Crl.RC.MP No 227412011 in Crl.RC.No.1 553/201 1 dated 21.t.2O1 1.

¶28

CRL.R.C. M, P. NO:2274 oF 2011

¶29

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to suspend the sentence awarded by the Lower Appellate Court dated 07 Ol .2O11 passed in crr.A No-365 0f 2010 0n the fire of the fl Addr. Irr,tetropc ritan sessions Judge, Hyderabacl, in the interest of justice.

¶30

CRL.R C.No.1 544 of 2O11 :

¶31

Criminal Revision Case U/s 392 & 401 of Cr.p.C against the Judgment made in crr'A.No.363 0f 2010 dated 07.07.2011 0n the fire of the ,r Additionar Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgment made in c'c'No.189 0t 2010 dated 01.10.2010 0n the fire of the court of the XVr Additional Judge Cum XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶32

CRL.R.C .M. P. NO:222 4 0F 2011

¶33

Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the ci.,.cu6"1un".. stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the firing of certified copy of the Judqment dated

¶34

01.10 2010 passed in c.c.No.126 of 2o1o on the fire of the xvr Addr. Judge cum xx Addr. chief Metroporitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice.

¶35

cRL.R.C. M.P. NO: 3946 OF 2017

¶36

Between

¶37

Gurucharan singh, s/o rate sardar. Nanda singh Bagga, Business R/o prot No.400, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad^-

¶38

...PETITIONER

¶39

AND

¶40

ll{s. Pralyqnkara Eteckonics pvt. Ltd., Rep.- by_its Managing Director, A.Mahesh Raiu. S/o Venkatapathi, ala SCi yrs.,-<_rcc Business, Rl/o plot No.60, Siddhartha Nagar, Vengalarabnaoar. ff vae,iat ri

¶41

A.Mahesh Raju, s/o Venkatapa"rhi, ausi;ii-Ryo prot No.60, Siddhartha

¶42

^^{!.usql Vengalaraonagar, Hydeiabad.}

¶43

The State of reranoan-, Refresented by its pubric prosecutor, High court of Andhra^pradesh, rivoeiaoi!.^-

¶44

...RESPONDENTS

¶45

Petition under Section 492 of cr-p -c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim orders granted in crl.RC.Mp No.2260i2011 in Crl.RC.No. 1 54 412O1 1 dated 27.7.2O1 1 .

¶46

cRL.R.C. M.P. NOi 2260 OF 2011

¶47

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the sentence awarded by the Lower Appelate court dated or.o7.2011 passed in crl.A.No-363 of 2o1o on the fire of the Ir Addr. Metroporitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. cRL.R.C.NO. I 555 0F 2011

¶48

criminal Revision case U/s 397 & 401 of cr.p.c against the Judgment made in crl.A.No.364 of 2010 dated 07.07.2011 on the fire of the [t Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgment made in c-c.No-127 of 2o1o dated 0'r.10.2010 on the fire of the court of the xvr Additional Judge cum XX Additionar chief Metroporitan Magistrate, Hyderabad CRL.R.C.M.P .NO:22420F 2011

¶49

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High court may be preased to

¶50

dispense with the firing of the certified copy of the judgment dated 01-10-2010 passed in c'c-No. 127 0f 2010 0n the fire of the xvr Additionar Judge cum XX Additional Chief lvletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

¶51

cRL.R.C. M.P. NO: 2276 oF 2011

¶52

Petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the sentence awarded. by the Lower Apperate court daled 07.o7.2011in crl Appeal No 364 of 2o1o on the fire of the ,r Additionar Metroporitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. CRL.R.C No.1556 of2O11 :

¶53

Criminal Revision Case U/s 3g7 & 401 of Cr.p.C against the Judgment made in crr.A.No.366 0I 2010 dated 07.07.2011 0n the fire of the *r Additionar Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgme nt made in C.C,No.128 of 2010 dated 01.10.2010 on the file of the Cou rt of the XVI Additional Judge Cum XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶54

CRL.R.C. M. P. NO: 2240 oF 2011

¶55

Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the firing of certified copy of the Judgment dated 01 10 2010 passed in c.c.No.12g of 2010 0n the fire ot the XVr Addr. Judge cum xx Addr' chief Metroporitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice.

¶56

CRL.R.C.M .P. NO: 3948 oF 2017 Between

¶57

Gurucharan Singh, S/o late Sardar Nanda Singh Bagga, Business R,o plot No_400, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad "

¶58

..PETITIONER

¶59

AND

¶60

M/s Pratyankara Electronics pvt. Ltd., Rep. by_ rts Managing Director, A.Mahesh Raiu. S/o ventatapaihi-a/gjg Viil"O"lrBusrness, R/o ptor No.60,

¶61

., I^{i99l3,rl, Nagar,} ^Vengatarabnagar, HvO"ir-OroI^""' 4. ..-rua.esn Karu. s/o venkatapathi, Business R/o plot No.60, Siddhartha

¶62

^{fSS{, Vengataraonagar,HyoeiaOaj.}

¶63

., ii:n?fF..:iJ",i1"',,X[;SS3resented^{bv its Pubric Prosecutor, Higrhcourr or}

¶64

...RESPONDENTS

¶65

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim orders granted in crl.RC.Mp No.22ltl2011 in Crl.RC.No. 1 55612O1 1 dated 21.7.2O1 1.

¶66

CRL.R.C.M.P. NO:2277 0F 2011

¶67

Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the sentence awarded by the Lower Appellate court dated o1 .07.2011 passed in crl.A.No.366 of 2010 on the file of the ill Addl. Metropotitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice.

¶68

Counsel for the Petitioners in all Crl.R.Cs : SRl. CHETLURU SREENMS Counsel for the Respondent No.1 in all Crl.R.Cs : VIZARATH ALI ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶69

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 in all Crl.R.Cs : SRI SUNIL B. GANU The Court made the following: ORDER

¶70

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL} CRIMINAL REVISI^{ON CASE Nos. 1553.1s44,1555 and} 1556 of2Oll

¶71

COMMON ORDER:

¶72

These Criminal^{Revision Cases are filed by the} petitioners herein^{aggrieved by the Judgments in Criminal} Appea,l Nos.365, 363,^{364 and366 of2O1O' dated} 07.O7.2}ll^{passed by thelearned IIIAdditional} Metropolitan Sessions^{Judge at Hyderabad confirmingthe} Judgments^{in.C.C.Nos.129,126, 127 and 128 of 2O10'} dated 01.10.20^{10 passedby the learned XVI Additional} Judge-cum-XX^{AdditionalChief MetropolitanMagistrate'} Hyderabad.

¶73

During pendency^{of the Criminal Revision Cases'a} Cost Memo^{uide USR.No.1OO392of 2023 and Joint Memos} uide USR.Nos.9O332,^{90330,90325 and 90328 of 2023} were filed by the petitioners/ accused^and respondent/complainant,^{which were signed by the parties}

¶74

which reads^as under:

¶75

¶76

"3. Reuision Petitioners and respond.ent/ Complainant subrnit that in tlte recent times the petitioner approached the complainant and proposed for comprornise/ settlement. The discussion betuteen them utere fruitfuI and_ both the parties ariued to a compromise with the aduice and. tteruention of Loe ll-wisher s _

¶77

Both the parties submit that the petitioners shaLl be panlutg Rs.15,O0,0OO/- to the responclent/ complainant in the folloutirtg nctnner towards full and final settleri.ent of four^{cases artd} any other cases pend.ing betueen.

¶78

o) Dernortd Draft it fauor of Mr. Guru Charan Singh l3ogga (Complainattt/ respondent herein) uide D.D. Be:aring No.OO1743. clate,rl 2U 08 2023, dranun on ITDFC Barh for Rs.5,OO.OOO/ -.

¶79

b) Detrtctrtcl Draft irt fauor of Mr. Guru Chnran Singh Bagoct (Oontplairutrtt,/ resportd_ent herein) uid.e D.D. Bearing No.OO5)56. dated 12.O9.2O23, drattlt on HDFC Bank for Rs. 1O,0O,OOO/ .

¶80

5, 1t is herebg agreed bg both the parties to Crl.R. C.,Vos. 1553, 1544, 15.55 and 1556 of 2O11 pending ort the frle of l-lon'lcle lligh Court of Telangana, that all the issues lrelpe erL tltern are settled and both the parties agreed to settkz all fhe issues by receiuing the Demand Drafts aboue tnent.ioned /or Rs. 1S,OO,0OO/- tou.nrds full attd Jinal settlenent of oll kirtds.

¶81

¶82

Today, both^{the parties are present beforethis Court} and they^{were identihed by their respectivecounsel'This} Court,^{when examined, respondentNo'2/complainant'} submitted^{that out of his own volition and without there} being^{any pressure he has enteredinto compromise and he} has no^{objectiohin case the revisionpetitioners have been} acquitted^{for thecharge under Section 138 ofthe} Negotiable^{InstrumentsAct' 1881'}

¶83

ln Damodar^{S' Prabhu v' Sayed Babalal the Honble} Apex Court^{has categoricallyheld that "while exercising} power under^{Sectio n147 of the NegotiableInstruments} Act, 1881,^{the Court can proceedwith the compromrse} even after^{recording the conviction"'}

¶84

In view^{of the aforesaid principlesof law' and in the} light ol the^{compromise arrived at betweenthe parties'the} compromise^{memos and the costs memo frled by both the} partles are^recorded.

¶85

Accordingly,^{these Criminal RevisionCases are} allou,ed in^{terms ofcompromise'setting aside the}

¶86

'^{(:o trt) s scc oel}

¶87

¶88

judgments dated O1.1O.20iO and 07.OZ.2Oll in C.C.Nos. l'29, 126, t2Z and 128 of 2OlO on the file of the learned XVI Additior-ral Judge_cum_XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and Criminal Appeal Nos.365, 363, 364 ar-rd 366 of 2Ol0 on the file of the learned III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judee at Hyderabad ar-rd the revision petitioners/ accused acqr-rittedl for thc offence punishable under Section l3g ol the Negotiable Instruments Act. 1gB I .

¶89

Miscellatreous petitions, if an-v, pending, shall stald

¶90

closed.

¶91

Sd/- T. SRINIVAS DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶92

'-\y'^'

¶93

SECTION OFFICER

¶94

To,1. The lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad 2. The XVI Additionat Judge cum XX Additiona'i chief ivletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶95

One CC to Sri Chetluru Sreenivas, Advocate (OPUC)

¶96

One CC to Sri Sunil B.Banu, Advocate (OPUC)

¶97

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶98

Two CD Copies

¶99

(along with a copy of Joint Memos)

¶100

Note : A Costs Memo Vide U.S.R.No.100392 of 2023 is filcd.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1011012023

COMMON ORDER

CRL.R.C.Nos.1 553, 1544, 1555 and 1556 of 2011

¶105

':lL S14f
o+ c-
x
q
cJ
1 1 0E[ 2023 o
.t
{
Cg.lpnt lH( '
:2-

¶106

Allowing the Crl.R.G in terms of compromise.

¶107

;-rlc
2
t\ <) )---:)

¶108

IN THE COURT OF HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD For the State of Telangana

¶109

Crl.RC.No.1S53 OF 2ofl

¶110

Between

¶111

PRATYANKARA ELECTRONICS PVTLTD Rep by its authorized person A Mahesh Raju

¶112

A Mahesh^'Raju

¶113

Pe t il ion ers/A p pello n ls And

¶114

I . The Stb te of Tetongono

¶115

Guruchoron Singh Boggo

¶116

Respondenl s/Com ploinon ls

¶117

.IOIN'I'M EMO ITIL ED BY TH E PE'IITI ON ERS/ACC UStrD ANI) RI] D ENI)'COM PLAINANi'

¶118

Petitioners filed the prerent Revision petitions oggrieved by the orde. dt.o7 to1 r2o' posied in Crl.A.No.366/2Ofl on the file of lll Addl lr,letropotitorr Sersion ludge, Hyderobod, confirming the ludgment dt.Ot/lOl2otO possed in CC.t28l2oto on the file of Hon'ble XVt Addl ludse Cum XX Addl CMM, Hyderobod.

¶119

Lihe-wire there ore 3 other Reuision p€tition, vide. . S/$dH1,196*{i2eil.ilfired .,oEsrieeed by otdeB dt.O7lO7l2O porsed tn Crl.A.No.363/2Ofl.

¶120

Fcflflql{Ailsss/2orr fited ossrieued by orders dt-ozlo7l2o[ possed tn Crl.A.No.36s/2O .

¶121

Crl.RC.Nos.lss6/20rt filed oggrieued by orde1 dt.oTlotl2olt porred Crl.A.No.364/2ofl.

¶122

tor^{PRAIYAI|I0RA ELECIR0I{ICS PRNAIE tllN$}

¶123

r-. rqau..pr-v-r \9-t

¶124

tuttroririd^$hmhry

¶125

,.A -^{l--c\u-l-a'-'- 6.4').i}

¶126

h ,&'

¶127

Reuision Petitioners^{ondre5pondent/Co'rploinont tubmitthotin therecent timesthe} petitioner opprooched the comploincnt^{ond propored forcompromise/settlement'} The discussion between^{themwerefruitful ond Lroththe porties orriuedto o} compromise^{with the qdviceond inter'rention of well-wishers'}

¶128

Both the^{porties.,ubmitthot the petitioners sholl be poying Rs.l5,oo,ooo/-(Fifteen} Lohhs only) to the^{respondent/Comploiriontin thefollowingmonnertowrrrds full ond} Finol settlement oi^{4/tour coses ond orrv other cqses pending betweenthem:-}

¶129

o) Demond Droft in^{fovor ofMr'Curu Choron SinshBoggo} (Comploinont/respondent herein)^{uideDD'Beoring'No'oo'1743'dlzalogl2o23'} drown on HDFC^{Bonhfor Rs.5,oo,ooo/- (Five Lohhs Only)'}

¶130

b) Demond Droft in^{fovor ofMr'Curu Choron SinshBoggo} (Com ploi nont /responde nt^herei n)^{vide DD'Beoring'No o o5256'dt l2J09 l2o23'} drown on^{HDFCBonhfor Rs.lo,oo,ooo/-CIen Lohhs Only)'}

¶131

tt is hereby^{osreedbyboth the portiesto the crl.RC.Not.l553/2Oll,l544l2oll,l555l2o1l.} t556l2o1l pending on the file of Hon'ble^{High Court of Telongono'thot oll the isrues} between thenr ore tettled^{ond both -he porties ogreedto settle oll the irluer by} receiving the Demond drofts^{obove rnentionedfor Rl'l5,oo'Ooo/- (Filteen Lohhs} only) towords^{full ond tinol settlement of oll hinds'}

¶132

o. The Comploinont/respondent.No.2^{herein hos no objectionto ollow l:herevision} petitions filed by the^petitioner5.

¶133

7 ln vicw of oll the^{oforesoidthir Hon'ble Court moyrecordthe someond ollowthe} Revrsion^{petitions os} settred/compro.''?t, r ordert in oiifl nfifltfttffifffimnmnet$e

¶134

the interest of lustice.

¶135

r^. L^-o'l,-P{'4 l=-a--r* -,1. L-r.otr.zfx.t^r-y--l
IdhorisdWut
Ploce ')
Dote: Petitioner/Appellont
Cou or Petitioner/Appellont
t--
n.roo\nHnticolDr '.J oi no nt

¶136

Counsel for Restrcndent/C<jmploinsnt

¶137

i':lr.t: lt..'.. i

¶138

IN THE COURT OF HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD For the State of Telangana

¶139

Crl.RC.No.ts44 OF 2ofl

¶140

Belween

¶141

PRATYANKARA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Rep by its authorized person A fuf"f,."f, n".;u

¶142

A Mahesh Raju

¶143

. . . Petitioners/A ppe on ts And

¶144

l. The Stole of Telongono

¶145

Guruchoron Singh Boggo

¶146

. Respond en lslCo m p lo in on ls

¶147

JOtNl. MEM() IIILE DBYTHE PETITIONE RS/ACCUSDD ANI) I{ESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT'

¶148

t. petitionerr filed the prerent Revision [retition, oggrieved by the orders dt.o7lo7t2ofi posed in Crl.A.No.363/2O[ o Hyderobod. .onri.-ing *," ,;ljn :ff:li#1,:il:::[;:: :: ;:r,,; of Hon'ble XVt Addt ludge Cum XX Ac{dl CMM, Hyderobod.

¶149

.,htjir#iihgfS gre 3 olher.RevBt6hfletitions vide.

¶150

. Crl.RC.Nos.t55 312}fl f ed oggrieved by otde$ dt.o7lo7t2o polred tn Crl.A.-No.366/20lt. nsEFd lia!lIi

¶151

. Crl.RC.Nos.t55s/2oll filed oggrieved by ordel dt.o|toll2olt porred in Crl.A.No.365/2oll.

¶152

. Crt.Rc.Nos.r5s 612c/1I tild oggrierred by ordeo dt.Ot tO7 t2oll posred tn

¶153

Crl.A.No.364/2olt.

¶154

tor PRlIYAlll0Rl ELICIR0I{ICS PRMIE UlllB q"^*
tuhrintSifrt,

¶155

cA . t lo-t .c f*rN9-a^-/

¶156

Revision^{petitionersond respondent/Cornploinontrubmitthqt in therecent timesthe} petitioner opprooched the comploinor't^{ondproposedforcompromise/settlement'} The discussion between^{themwerefruitful ond boththe porties orriuedto o} compromise^{with the odviceond intervention of well-wishers'}

¶157

¶158

Both the^{portiessubmitthot the petiti')nersshollbe poying Rr'15'oo'ooo/-(Fifteen} Lohhs only) to^{the respondent/Comploirrontin the following monner towords full ond} FinolJettlementol4lfourcosesondonllothercosespendingbetweenthem:.

¶159

o) Demond Droft in^{fouor ofMr.CuruChoron Singh Boggo} (Comploinont/rerpondent herein) uide^{DD Beoring'No'ool743' dl2aloal2o23'} drqwn on HDFC^{Bonhfor Rs.5,oo,ooo/- (Five Lohhs Only)'}

¶160

b) Demond Droft in^{fovor ofMr'Curu ChoronSin-cth} Boggo (Comploinont/respondent herein) 'ride^{DD Beoring'No 005256' dt'} 10912023, drown on HDFC^{Bonhfor R5.lo,oo,ooo/-OenLohhsOnly)''}

¶161

lt is hereby ogreed^{byboth theportiesto the crl.Rc.Not.l553/2oll,15 44l2ol1,l555l2oll'} 1556/20ll^pending on the^{file of Hon'bleHigh Courtof Telongono,thot oll the issues} between them ore^{settled ond both theporties ogreed to tettleoll the irsues by} receiuing the Denrond drofts^{obove rnentionedforRs'15'oo'Ooo/-(FifteenLohhs} only) towords^f ull ond^{finol settlement of oll hindl'}

¶162

o. The Comploirlont/relpondent.No.2^{herein hos no objectionto ollow the reuition} petitionr filed by the^petitioner:

¶163

ln view of oll the^{oforesoid this Hon'bleCourtmoy recordthe someqrld ollow the} Reui!ion^petitions os set^{ed/compromi,ed ondposl suchother ond ilrther orderr in} theintererrortustice. ForppATyAlllfiRAE[ECTR0tilCSpRlyAIEUIITO

¶164

L\o-L!-r-r\_o-r.!\luhorirdSight^{!,\ - l-^oJ,^.ro-rr1N+?}

¶165

Ploce:Hyderobod Dote: /O9/2O23. Petitioner/Appellont

¶166

Coun for Petitioner/ApPellont

¶167

Rerpondent/ComP ont

¶168

Counsel^f or Resp3ndent/Compl$ipqrfi.:,r1';

¶169

IN THE COURT OF HICH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD For the State of Telangana

¶170

Crl.RC.No.6sS OF 2ofl

¶171

Belween

¶172

1 PRATYANKARA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Rep by its authorized person A Mahesh Raju

¶173

A Mahesh Raju

¶174

Petitioners/A ppellon ts And

¶175

I Ihe Stote of Telongono

¶176

Guruchoron Singh Boggo

¶177

R esponde n tslC o m ploin o n ts

¶178

JOIN'I MEMO FILED I] Y THE PETITIONERS/A CCUSED AND RESPONDENT/COMPI, AINANT

¶179

petitionerr fired the present Reuirion petitionl oggrieved by the orden dt.o7to7t20l1 posred in Crl.A.No.365/2Oll on the file of lll Addl Metropoliton Session ludge, Hyderobod' confirming the rudgment dt.or/lol2.ro posred in cc.r29l20ro on the fire of Hon'bte XVI Addl ludge Cum XX ACdt CMM, Hyderobod. 0lIiiJtJJiirri,.",,,,:,:.". i

¶180

2 Lihe-wi:e theri: ore 3 other Revision petitionl uide.

¶181

' r$&$&UnA,lpt3/2oll filed osrsrieued by otde' dt.ot to7 t2olr porsed in Crl.A.No.366/20lt.

¶182

Crt.RC.Nos.t54 4t2o| tiled oggrieued try orde6 dt.otto7l2ofl porred in

¶183

Crl.A.No.363/2o .

¶184

. Crl.RC.Nos.r5s 612c, fited oggrieved by otde6 dt.Ot lOT t2o[ possed tn

¶185

Crl.A.No.364/2Ofl.

¶186

Fot PRATIAIII,q8I^{crrr,rrurrt! iillIAll ul{IH)}

¶187

LA^{. l.r.Cl.t-,\l--7-nAr-11^./}

¶188

ldo'i$dSi$bl

¶189

U,A^{. ,L-,r-a.t-'tr-'z:--.. fta--n:}

¶190

Revision Petitioners^{ond re5pondent/Cor-rploinont submit thotin therecenttimei the} petitioner opprooched the^{comploinontond proposedforcompromise/rettlement'} The discussion^{between them were t''uitfulond both the porties orrived to o} compromise^{with the odviceond intervention of well-wishers'}

¶191

¶192

Both the^{podier submit thot the petitioners sholl be poving Rs't5,oo,ooo/-(Fifteen} Lohhs only)^{to the respondent/Comploirrontin the following mdnnertowordrfull ond} Finol settlement^{of 4/four coses ond orry other cosespending betweenthem:-}

¶193

o) Demond Droft^{in fovor ofMr'Curu Choron Singh Boggo} (Comploinont/respondent^herein) ';ide^{DD'Beoring No'oo'1743'dl'28logl2o23'} drown on HDFC^{Bonhfor Rt 5,oo.ooo/-(Five LohhsOnlv)'}

¶194

b) Demond Droft^{in fovor ofMr'Guru Choron SinshBoggo} (Comploinonti respondent^{herein)vide DD BeoringNo'oo5256'dt} lo9l2o23' drown on HDFC^{Bonhfor Ri'lo,oo'ooo/-(TenLohhrOnly)'}

¶195

5.ltilherebyogreedbyboththeportiegt.)thecrl.Rc.No9.l553i2o1l,l544l2oll,|555120li1, 1556/20ll^{pending on the file of Hon'bie High Court of Telongono'thotoll the issues} between them ore^{settled ond both thepqrties ogreedto settle oll theissues by} receiving the^{Demonddroftloboue rnentionedfor Rs'15'oo'ooo/- (FifteenLohhs} only) towords^{full ond finol settlement of oll hinds'}

¶196

The Comploinont/retpondent.No^{2 herein hos no obiectionto ollow the revision} petitions filed by the^petitioners

¶197

ln view of^{oil the oforeroidthisHon',tr,e court moy recordthe some ond ollow the} Revision^{petitions os setfled/compro',,'ififtt(lRlliltttltlmhfmnmnft{rffir orders in} the interest^of lustice

¶198

,*a'-rhffitfr,ul t^{l .l"-vO.r-ra-.} N+fl Petitioner/ApPellont

¶199

Ploce:Hyderobod. Dqte: /o9/2o23.

¶200

Cou for Petitioner/Appellont

¶201

q Respondenti loinont

¶202

Counsel^f or Respondent/Comploinont

¶203

i',,jY:t;,^{1 dlrrr:; .}

¶204

¶205

IN THE COURT OF HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD For the State of Telangana

¶206

crl.RC.Nio.rss6 0F 201t

¶207

Belween :

¶208

PRATYAiYKARA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Rep by its authorized person A fr4afresfr nalu

¶209

A Mahesh Raju

¶210

. . Pe lilio n ers/A p pellon ls And

¶211

Ihe Sio te of Telongono 2 Guruchoron Singh Boggo

¶212

Responde n ls/Com ploin o n is

¶213

JOINT ME MO FILE D BY THI' I,ul-l'floN ERS/AC CUSED AND Rt]SPON DIrNl i(.'OMP LAINANT

¶214

petitione, fired the prelent ReuiJion r-'etitionr oggrieved by the orde' dt.o 7ro7r2.,, possed in Crl.A.No.364/2Olt on the file of lll Addl Metropoliton Session ludge, Hyderobod, confirming the ,udgment dt.ol/ro/2olo po:red in cc.r2z2oro on the file of Hon'bte XVt Addt ludse Cum XX Addt CMM, Hyderobod.

¶215

'lHiJ illlif! a; ,';r Io. j,ii'"'LiheJire there ore 3 other Revirion petitionr uide.

¶216

. Crl.FlC.Norl5S3/2On filed oggrierrr:d b5r orden dt,O7lo7laofl porjed in tql? ira'o::IA Gl.A.No.366/2o,. . Crl.Rc.Nol.l544l2ol f.ld oggrietrcd by orders dt.O7lO7l2O1 Wsted tn Crl.A.No.363/2olt. o Gl.RC.Nos.l555/2Ou filed oggriet,ed by orden dt.O7lo7l2ofl porred in Crl.A.No.365/2o[.

¶217

¶218

tn Pf,[IIAtll0fl[EttCIR0lllCS^PRI{NIttrlE

¶219

t". t^-$.-C-^-'--r-'- r\g-"r-{.

¶220

tu$otittdlirfr,

¶221

rA, t-r-cr-tr-s-rv-Nst-vJ

¶222

¶223

3 Revision Petitioners^{ond re5pondent/Cor nploinont rubmitthotin the recerrttimesthe} petitioner opprooched the comploinont^{ondproposedfor compromise/settlement'} The discussion between^{themwerefruitful ond both the porties orrived to o} compromite with the^{oduice qnd intervention of well-wishers'}

¶224

4 Both the^portiet rubmit thot^{the petitionerlsholl be poyingRs l5'oo'ooo/-(Fifteen} Lqhhs only) to the respondent/Comploinont^{in the following monner towords full ond} Finol settlement of^{4/four cqses ond ony other cotet p€nding betweenthem:-}

¶225

o) Demond Droft in^{fouor ofMr.CuruChoron Singh Boggo} (Comploinont/respondent herein) vide DDBeoring'NoOol743'^{dtzel0gl2o23,} drown on HDFC Bonh^{for Rt.s,oo,ooo/-(Five Lohhs Onlv)'}

¶226

b) Demond Droft in fouor^{ofMr.GuruChoronSingh} Boggo (Comploinont/respondent herein) vide^{DD.BeoringNoOo52S6' dt} 10912023. drown on HDFC^{Bonhfor Rs.lo,oo,ooo/-(Ten LohhsOnly)'}

¶227

lt is hereby ogreed by^{both the portier to the crl.RC.N05.l553/2Oll, 1544/20ll, 1555/20ll,} '1556/2011 pending on the file of Hon'ble High Court of Telongono' thot^{oll the issues} between them ore settled ond^{both the portietogreedto settle oll the isuesby} receiving the Demond drqfts^{oboue rnentionedtor Rr'l5,oo,ooo/- (F'fteen Lohhs} only) towords full ond^{finol rettlementof oll hindr'}

¶228

ln view of oll the^{oforeroidthisHon'ble Courtmoy recordthe romeotrdollow the} Revision Petitiont os settled/compromtred^{ond poss ruch other ond furtherorden in} the interert of iuttice.^{The Comploinorrt/respondent.No.2 hereinhos go objection to} oltow the revision^{petitionrfitedby the petitioners.} Fo'PRffi1111X15gg1R0lllCS PfllY{EtS v4. l--\o-c,'-c--l--y.\f-4-r'-'+'^{Llat'\e-r^r}t}?y.}

¶229

Ploce:Hyderobod Dote: /o9/2023. Petitioner/ApPellont Co I for PeUtioner/APPellont Q,,^.-vRespondent/Cor\Ploinont

¶230

tuliqirq, Stot

¶231

Counrel^{for Respondent/Complqinont}

¶232

rjliHj ,iril,,r.. ., r ,lr.,;lirrir{vrrrr,rl

¶233

f^{i{i:f,!rii::,ii.r;ir i}

M/S. Pratyankara Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anothers v. the State of Ap.,Rep by Its P.P and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Pratyankara Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anothers v. the State of Ap.,Rep by Its P.P and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Nagaraju Vs the State of Ap., through the P.P and 3 Others

Gobba Ravinder Reddy, R.R.District Vs the State of a.P., Rep. by Pp., Hyderabad

Mohammed Amjad Kahn Vs the State of A.P.

P.Ramdev S/o P.Deenvan Rao, Vs The State of Telanangana, Rep. by its

M/S. Pratyankara Electronics Pvt.Ltd., Hyderabad and Another Vs the State of a.P., Rep.by Pp., High Court, Hyderabad and Anr.

Venkata Vasudev Vs M/S. Gandhar Oil Refinery India Ltd. and Another