Petitioner sought enhancement of sentence from life imprisonment to death. Court dismissed revision due to lack of jurisdiction over a later Division Bench judgment that acquitted the accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA . ATHYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OFOCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:2460 ot 2013
Criminal Revision Case filed underSection397 & 401 of Cr.P.C.,agaimt the order dated 27-og-2o13passed in s.c.No.407of 2o13 on the file of the courtof the Sessions Judge atMahabubnagar.
Between:
P.Nagaraju, S/o. P.Ramanaiah, aged43 years, Occ: GovernmentEmployee, R/o.H-.No.1 6-11 -511 lFI 11 I A,Shalivahanagar,Hyderabad-500060.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. SUNITANAWANDAR, Counsel r€presenting SRI VIVEK JAIN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1:SRI VIZARATHALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the RespondentsNo.2 to4: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E'V'VENUGOPAL CRIMINALREVISION CASE No.2460 oF 2013
oRDER:
This CriminalRevision Case has been filed assailingthe judgment d,ated27'09'2013in S'C' No' 4O7 of 2Ol3 passed by SessionsJudge atMahabubnagarfor not awarding death sentenceto the accused'
2
ffi
<br>
!.4'
of 20 13. The learned counsel further submits thatthe fact remains that the accused persons have committedheinous offences by brutalty committing murder by kidnapping a minor girl, who was 6 years old and killed for ransom. However, in the light of the acquittal of the accused byHon'lcle Division Bench of this Court in Crl. Appeal Nos. 973 &1166 of 2013 and Crl. Appeal No.495 of 2015, seeks permission of thisCourtto file appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Courtagainst the common judgment dated 18.1 1.2022passed byHon'ble Division Bench of this Court.
/
3
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this criminal
revision case stands closed.
sd/- T. SRINIVAS DEPUTYREGISTRAR
/ITRUECOPY//
ul''
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
kam b*
l J
HIGH GOURT
DATED:09t1012023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2460ot 2013
:itr,!: e STAI€
q
:)
0 4 rEc 2[23 F
4+
* !
*Dr, s; i..r.J c
THE GRIMINALREVISlON CASE IS DISMISSED
?-\ da-)
({r}
P. Nagaraju
Mohd. Yakub @ Quiser
Md. Naseem
Syed Ameer @ Amer
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
