Rs.500/- for each oflence, in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for a period of Lwo months on each count. Both the sentences shall run concurrently. Accused A.2 was also found guilty for the offence punishable under sectlon 394 of IPC, convictcd and senlenced to undergo Rrgorous Imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs.SOO/-, in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for a period ol Lu,o months. Aggrieved by the said Judgment accused A. I preferred an appeal before the first appellate Court and the fir_st appellate Court considering the entire evidence on record observed that as per the evidence of prosecution, accused came to the village of p.W. 1 and they were armed with guns, threatened P.W. 1 to 3 by posing themselves as Naxalites and also demanded them to arrange money on the next day. p.Ws. 1 to 8 stated that as villagers were being informed regarding threatening of the accused, alt the villagers attacked when the accused entered into the village. There was a conflict between the offenders and the villagers. As a result, one Sudhakar died and other accused was arrested. The Iirst appellate Court confirmed the Judgment of the trial Court. Aggrieved by the said ,Judgment, accused preferred the present Criminal Revision Case.
