claught'r is rct the natural dcath, bul aftcr inves illati,rtr itr,rvas l-reld lhrrt sh:,lied due to 'acute coron.ary insufllci't, cy'ancl it is the nzrtLlr:rl ceath. Plzrintiffs filed O.S.No. 1917, f l]O10 for dccl:rrertion 1nd injLlnction. In the said Suit r,hc r)en lenc), of o.S.No.139t ol 2008 anci O.P.No.56 of 2009 were rnentione(l bv I'rim. It u'.ls ccntested b), defendant No.3, th,: s:rid lluit u':rs disposcd r,f, n merits, in which it was observed th zL dccrcc u'as gr.rnle( in [z vc,ur of defcndant No.3 in O.S.N,r.439 ] rf 2 00il an<l no appcal \'i s preferred, Lrut horvever the value of LlLe propcrt ies fronr A to ) s more thar-r Rs.1,00,000/- and Lhus tltr: st.id Court has n,)t p'cuniary jurisdiction to decirle tlL,t SuiL zrncl accordirrgly it u,as dismissed on 24.O4.2A13. l'r, intiffs I'ilcd O.S.No 185," cf 2013 sceking to declare thcm ar; xvtrcrs and succcs:iorli rf the dcccarsed Veena Kumarr. llut n thc said Judgnrcnt it u,as observcd that aiready O.S.No.ti3,t of 2 013 u,as filed bclor,; t 1e Court as on the date of filing thc se icl suit anrl t<.r avoicl nrulr ip icitl' of 11-rc Judgments, the said Suit rv:rs dismissccl on 23. 10 2( 1,3. The copy of the petition itn<[ colrntcr in O.P.No.56 oi 2109 is fik:d, but the Order ol tlre sai: cet.tion has not bccn 1- lt: i belbre this Court.
