This appeal was dismissed as infructuous by a single judge of the Telangana High Court who was of the view that no further adjudication on the cause of appeal was required.
Criminal Appeal dismissed as infructuous with miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 459 0F 2023
Appeal Under Section 378 (4) of Cr.p.C. aggrieved by the Order / Judgment dated 03-08-2010 in c.c.No. 346 of 2008 on the file of the Hon,bte XV Additional Judge cum xlx Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate , Nampally, Hyderabad
Between:
9.MI 9.TEIPURAMBHA,W/g^L-q!eViswanath Aged58 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o Flat No.53, H.No,'16-1 1-585/4, Sujatha Clissic A-partments, CaOaianniram, Hyderabad ...AppELLAttil Compiiinar*
AND
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. JAVED RAZACK
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : THE pUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : None appeared
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
l -)
THE I{OI CiURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SUREiI{I.)ETT
CRI MINAL APPEAL No.459 OFi202ll
IUDGMENTT
This Crinrinal Appeal is filed under Section3;'B(4)c1'thi: Code of Criminal Procecu'e, 1)73(for short'Cr.P.C.')by the tlppe lilrrt tc set aside thejudgment,lateJ 03.08.2010passedin C.C.No.346 cf 2008 by the learned XV .Additi tral Judge-cum-XIXAdditionalChief Me tropolitan Magistrate, Hycle-at arl and sentencethe respondent of t:he c:rar;es levied against him.
dismissed as inl'ruct tc,us.
Miscellaneou: Petitions,pending if any, shallstand ,:lo:ed
Sd/- I. NAGALAKSHMI DEI'I,ITY (ilREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPYi/
IiE:CTIONOFFICER
To
t- ! I>'-
HIGH COUR]
DATED:26/06/iI023
JUDGMENT
CRL.APPEAL No.4{ 9 of 2023
<)
l,-/.
iS IUG NB I
,i ':
!L:
'11
a
I)1SMISSIN(; TIIE C U,.APPEAL AS
INFRTICTUOUS
b
f[.,t ti+
I
i? /t.l $1 >:t
)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal filed by the appellant is maintainable or has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MI Teipurambha Viswanath
Nageswar Rao
The State of A.P.
Justice K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
