In a criminal revision petition seeking stay of proceedings in a domestic violence case, the petitioner withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA . AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1059 OF 201s
Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order daled 23.02.2015 made in D.V.Crl.Appeal No.423 of 2014 on the file of the court of the ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad confirmrng the order dated 23.10.2013 passed in DVC.No.96 of 2012 on the file of court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
K. Sanjrva Reddy, S/o Late K Muthyam Reddy, Occ Welder, R/o H No.1 1-4-32, Champapet, Srrnivasa Colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
l.A. NO: 2 OF 201S(CRLRCMP. NO: 1697 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Judgment in D.V.Crl.Appeal No.423 of 2O14 daled 23.02.2015 on the file of the ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Crl. Revision case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri R. VENKATESH GOUD, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P BHAVANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri D RAM GOPAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: OROER
ORDER:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CAS E NO. 1059 oF 2015
This Criminal Revision Case is filcd undcr Se c(rons 397 and 4Ol of Crin-rinal Procedure Code (for short ,Cr.p.C.J by, thc petitioner aggrieved by the judgment dated 23.o2.2o1s passecr in I)V criminal Appeal No'423 of 2074 in DVC No.96 ot 2or2, on the file of the rearned II Additional Metropolitan Sessions .Judge, I{1,clcrabacl rvherein the order dated '23.1O.2013 passed by learnecl IV Mcrropolrtan Magistrate, Hyderabad in DVC No.96 of 2012 u,as confirme<I.
3 The lsrrespondent herein likrcl DVC No.()6 .f 2OI) against her husband/the petitioner, his mothcr and ststcr :rllcgrng domestic violence, demand for additionzrl dou.r1.:trrcl nccking oLit I.tcr I-rom the house. The petitioner denied all the allcgarions rnutlc r Itrr.r,in bv u,ay of counter. After examination ol pws. I to 3, RWs.I to 3 ancl Dxs.pl to P16 and D1 to D6, as pcr ordcrs d:rtt.d 23.10.2013, ilrt. lt:arncd [V Metropolitan Sessions,ludgc, H_i.clerabarl grantcd Rs.3.0o01 tou.ards
I'rrc 2oi3
i I -urclRs 2 'OOt) /-torvards maint.ellancewitheft-ecl- fron 23 'O4 ")0 alternativeaccommoclation chirrges1.o the l '' -esporldcr)t' to be paiciby Lhepetil.ioneron or before 1()rlrof e/ely ;nollill'Ihc sa'id ituditrgli wcre confirtnedb;r the learned II /rdclitionallvlctrop()litanSessiorts 'ludge' Hyderabadas per orders dat(:d23 02 2Ct Irn DV Criminal'{ppeal I\ic.423of 2b 14, preferred by the pe trt ione r'
5.Duringthecoursecllprlrl;<l1.l.IiIr[{S,learnedcounsel appearingon behalf of the peritior-r<'r's'hiic:;r.iomit'tingthat they illtend to notpress the matter, requcst('d the Court topermit th(rm to rvithdrarr, theplesent criminal rer,isitltt castl. Lc:rrnecAssistant Public Prosccutorand learned cout-rscl lclr the l'tI'('rjpoll(lent concededt<-r the same.Inthatvieq,ofthemattcr,thiscor'rrtL:;irlclinedtodismissthe present criminalrevisioncasc 'ts''r-ithdrzrrltr'
I)ar:c J of J
withdrau,n. Interlocutorv applications, if any pending, shall stand dismissed
Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
/<\D-
HIGH COURT DATED:31 10712023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1059 of 2015
1tr E STATC
.>
e
la() 02 0Et 208 l,o
* i
, a'E-. . a ',',t -()
CRIMTNAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
ilre .\ -.){
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in pending proceedings following a domestic violence judgment.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Sanjrva Reddy
Smt. K. Rajini
The State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
