The High Court of Telangana heard a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an order dismissed as infructuous by the trial court.
The Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13895 OF 2014
Between:
Vuppula Shailesh Kumar, S/o. Sudharshan, Occu Software Engineer, Presently R:/o. al H.No.22123,3'" Main,8 Cross, Venkatapura, New Extension, Bangalore
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Order dated 30.09.20'14 passed in Crl.R.P.No. 34 of 2O14 on the file of the Hon'ble ll Additional Sessions Judge, Warangal.
CRLPMP. NO: 14677 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in D.V.C.No.16 o'f 2013 on the file of Hon'ble Vl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Warangal, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition
CRLPMP. NO: 17492 OF 2014
Between:
Smt Vuppula @ Enabothula Ananamathi, Wo. V. Shailesh Kumar, Occ Housewife, Fl/o. H. No.3-3-203, Enugulagadda, Hanumakonda, Warangal
...PETITIO"NERY 2ND RESPONDENT
AND
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.12.2013 passed in Cr.P.No.13895 of 2014 by directing the trial court to proceed with the case against the petitioner, in the interest ofjustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.P.VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Ms. Shalini, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.13895OF 2014
ORDER:
The present criminalpetition is hled to quash the order dated 30.09.2014passed inCrl.R.P.No.34of 2014 on the file of II Additional Sessions Judge,Warangal.
r:
2
Interim Applications, pending if any, shall also stald
dismissed
Sd/-C.PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGIST
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To
Kj
P^n"
HIGH COURT
DATED:2810712023
. l..tL STAi
. .ra- /'(
,) -t-
15 ltR NB
,'/ ,u
'll
\ J
ORDER
CRLP.No.13895 ol 2014
Pl"q, 24.Ls\r'j
DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC should be dismissed as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vuppula Shailesh Kumar
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
