Dismissed

Gundada Murali Krishna and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC14 Mar 2023CRLP/9406/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashment of proceedings as infructuous, noting that a charge sheet had been subsequently filed and a separate petition questioning it survived. Miscellaneous applications were closed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Gundada Murali Krishna and 4 Others Vs The State of… — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

132s11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:9406 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Gundada Murali Krishna, S/o Gundada Murali Krishna, Occ. Business,^Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. 1-6-150/10, Budvel, Rajendrangar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

Gundada Chitti Bai, Wo. G. Krishna, Occ. House Wife, Aged^{about54 years,} R/o. 1-6-1 50/10, Budvel, Rajendrangar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

Gundada Hemanth, S/o. Gundada Krishna, Occ. Business,^Aged about³⁷ years, R/o.^'1-6-1 50/10, Budvel, Rajendrangar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

Gundada Sridhar, S/o. Gundada Krishna, Occ.Business, Aged about 32 years, F|/o. 1-6-150/10, Budvel, Rajendrangar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

Korani Jayar$, S/o. K Narsimha, Occ. Business, Aged aboul4T^{years,Rl/o. 1-} 534, Budvel, NearChurch, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 to 5

¶14

AND

¶15

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through Godavari Khani I Town P.S., Ramagundam District.

¶16

Gundada Premalatha, Wo. G. Murali Krishna, Aged about 30^years, Occ Housewife,^trUo. 17-2-217, Dwarakanagar, Ramagundam, Ramagundam District.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANTS

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Court may} be pleased to^quash Crime No. 325 of 2020 Godavarikhani I^TownP.S. Ramagundam for the offences under Sections 498-A IPC Section 3 and 4^of Dowry Prohibition Act, against the Petitioners / Accused^'1 to 5, in the interest of justice.

¶19

LA. NO: 3 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise in crime No. 325 of 2o2o Go=davarikhani I Town P-s., Ramagundam for the offences under sections 4gg-A rpc section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in the interest of justice and pass

¶21

l.A. NO: 2OF 2021

¶22

Petition urider Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners / Accused 1 to 5 to compound lhe offence in crime No. 325 ot 2020 on the file of Ramagundam I Town p.S., Godavarikhani for the offences under sections 498-A lpc Section 3 and 4 of Dowry prohibittn Act, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M A tvuJEEB, Advocate for the petitioner and the public prosecutor for the state of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.i and of Sri. K JAGADISHWAR REDDY, for the Respondent No.2

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶25

CRIMIN AL PETITION No.9406 of 2O2L

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

This Criminal petition is hled by the petitioners/A1 to A5 questioning the FIR.

¶28

Since charge sheet is filed, subsequently, and questioning the charge sheet Crl.p.No.662l of 2022 is also filed, nothing survives for adjudication in this criminal petition.

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶30

Miscellaleous applications pending, if any, shall

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

Sd/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

.6'

SECT]ON OFFICER

To,

The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Godavarjkhani.

¶39

The Station House Officer, Godavarikhani I Town Police Station, Ramagundam.

¶40

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor,^{High Courtfor the state of Telangana at} Hyderabad (OUT)

¶41

One CC to SRl. M A MUJEEB, Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

One CC to K JAGADISHWAR^{REDDY,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶43

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:1410312023

ORDER

CRLP.No.9406 of 2021

{ yl i: S T4
( t), tu
+
I
2 4 liril 2[23

DISMISSING THE

CRIMINAL PETITION

AS INFRUCTUOUS

\ 4

Gundada Murali Krishna and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gundada Murali Krishna and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. B. R. Traders Vs State of Telangana and another

Chenna Vidyasagar Vs State of Telangana and 7 Others

V.Prabhakar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Chikkala Apoorva , Sankuri Apoorva Vs State of Telangana and another

Mr. Vegesna Chaitanya Kumar , Vegeshna Chaitanya Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and another

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar Vs Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy