Allowed

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar v. Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy

Telangana HC14 Mar 2023CRLP/386/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana, in a common order, allowed Criminal Petition and two linked LWAs under Sections 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against petitioners accused of forgery and cheating. The quashing was permitted as parties compounded the offences via an MOU and the Legal Services Committee verified their identities.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of proceedings in Cr. No. 2540 of 2017; compoundable offences extinguished; Petitioners to pay Rs. 5,000/- to Director, Sainik Welfare.

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar Vs Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

j I tI ff ..' I I' l"l I '^l:. ar, ri; * :.4fr

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^OF TELANGANA : AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH ]i^{. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE}

¶5

{ i I I I ' ii

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 386 012023 ALONG WITH l.A.NOs.3 AND 4 OF 2023

¶9

cRl MINAL PETITION NO: 386 OF 2023:

¶10

Between:

¶11

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar, S/o. Sri Late M. Gouraiah.^{Aged about 92 years,} Occ. Retired, Fi/o H. No. 3-5-139121A, Shiva Nagar,^{Hyderguda,Attapur,} Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad^- 500048. Rep by his GPA Holder MS.Mogili Vyjayanti vasanta^{(Previously known as Sri} KumarP as^per Court order dated. 14.02.2023^{in l.A.No.5 ol 2023}

I I I

i I I : I

,. 1

z. Sri. Mlvilay Kumar,^presently known as Ms. Mogli Vyjayanti^{Vasanta(Having}

¶16

' 'changed her name vide Gazette Notification No. 123-A dated 31 .08.2017) D/o ' Sri. H. No.. Mogli 3-5-139121A, Jagdish Kumar, Aged about Shiva Nagar, Hyderguda, 45^years, Occ. Attapur,^{Policy Professional,} Rajendra Nagar^Rl/o . Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500048.

¶17

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND 2

¶18

AND

¶19

Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o Sri.^Late Subhash^{Reddy,Aged about51} years, Occ. Business, Fl/o H. No. 3-5-2515, Hyderguda, Attapqr, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District, Hyderabad - 500048.}

¶20

RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶21

The State of Telangana, Rep., by^{Pub[icProsecutor, High Court for the State} , of Telangana at.Hyderabad.

¶22

\ +f, tt + a t.

¶23

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶24

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in the circumstances} '.i:^{stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof, Criminal Petition,the High Court may} . be pleased to^quash the^proceedings against the^{Petitioners/AccusedNo.'1 and} ' 2 in Cr. No. 2540 ot 2017 on the file of the SHO, P.S. Ralendranagar, Cyberabad in view of the Memorandum of Understanding^{daled27.O7.2022entered into by} and between the Petitioners^{and the 1st Respondent,which hasbeenrecorded} in ths Terms of Compromise^{filed in O.S.No. 1829 of 2017 on the file of the} Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga^{Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.}

I I

l ,-i

1 i t i i

l.A. NO: 2OF 2023

Petition unde^:lection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that i1 the circumstances stated in the Memo ;r'rdum of Grounds of Criminal Pe tition, t-re tligh Court may be pleased to stay ll further^proceedings in Cr. No. 11540 of 2017 on the file of the SHO, P.S. Ra.ier Jranagar, Cyberabad.

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2023

Between:

t 1. Sri. tt/ogli Jag :is h Kumar, S/o. Sri Late M. Gounriah. l\g'3d ,rbout 92 years, Occ. Retired, R/o H. No. 3-5-139121A, Shiva Nagar, Flyderguda, Attapur,

¶36

.: I , Rajendra Nag r Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabrcl - 510048. .'t{i.: ,. 11:.e l : Rep KumarP as by his GF^pe ,\ C.ourt Holder MS.Mogili Vyjayanti order dated. 1 4.02.2023 in vasarta l.,A.No. (Prr:r t o'f ous;ly 2)23known as Sri i :l' ., 'i 2. Sri. tvl Vijay K .nrar, presently known as Ms. Mogl Vyjaya'rti Vasanta (Having changed her r rnre vide Gazette Notification No. 1:23-A dal :d lll .08.2017) D/o

¶37

'^' Sri. [,4ogli Jagr is r Kumar, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Fc lir:y Professional, Rl/o H. No. 3-5-1 ,9,2/A, Shiva Nagar, Hyderguda, AttaFu', Flajendra Nagar Mandal, Rang Fleddy District, Hyderabad - 500048.

¶38

...PETITIONEFYAC:C USED No.1 AND 2

¶39

AND

¶40

1 Sri. G. Madhu: ,rc han Reddy, S/o Sri. Late Subhash Redrly Aged about 51 years, Occ. Br, ,;irress, R/o H. No. 3-5-2515, Hydergrda, Atti,rpur, Rajendranaga ['andal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabarl 501]048.

¶41

RESPONDENT/DEFA(;T O C OMPLAINANTC OMPLAINANTOMPLAINANT

¶42

iI RESPONDENT/DEFA(;T O C OMPLAINANTC OMPLAINANTOMPLAINANT I 2. The State of T langana, Rep., by Public Prosecutor, Higlt^(.;ourt for the State t J^l: of Telangana t llyclerabad. {i ,'* t -.: ! ...RESPONDEhIT/IlESPONDENT .;i a5) t ;'li' {,{ stated in^, Petition the [/emorunder rn S:ction lum of 320(6) of Cr.P.C Grounds of Criminal praying Pelition that in th: lhe High crrcumstancesCourt may -.i-:i .:i'.,i, 5s ,;ar..d to permi tle Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 a-rd 2 zrnrj 1't Respondent r:i,;fi] to compound the off rn:es in Cr. No. 2540 of 2017 on the file of the SHO, P.S. tt'.', * .i'd' Rajendranagar, Cyb, re berd for the offences punishable, unde r Section 420, 406, : 468 and 471 of the F.C. and pass such other order or orcler-s €s this Hon'ble Court deems fit and 'c per in the circumstances of the case

iI .t ,f :i..{t.l

' l.A. NO: 4 OE 2023

: I L

: Between:

Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o Sri. Late Subhash Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Business, Fi/o H. No. 3-5-2515, Hyderguda, Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500048.

¶48

i ti

¶49

¶50

PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1

¶51

AND1. Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar, S/o. Sri Late M. Gouraiah. Aged about 92 years, Occ. Retired, Rl/o H. No. 3-5-139121A, Shiva Nagar, Hyderguda, Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500048. Rep by his GPA Holder MS.Mogili Vyjayanti vasanta (Previously known as Sri KumarP as per Court order dated. 14.02.2023 in l.A.No. 5 of 2023

¶52

Sri. M. Vijay Kumar, presently known as Ms. Mogli Vyjayanti Vasanta (Having changed her name vide Gazette Notification No. 123-A dated 31 .08.201 7) D/o Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar, Aged about 45^years, Occ. Policy Professional, Fl/o H. No.3-5-139/2/A, Shiva Nagar, Hyderguda, Aftapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500048.

¶53

RESPONDENT/PETITIONERS

¶54

i It! {t 3. The State of Telangana, Rep., by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State j.l i ..'. . of Telangana at Hyderabad. 1 I, li ..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT : .il t. j\ .rI' .,: ' Petition under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances t I xn.t 'j.* ' l':'t' stated in theiMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the.l-.{igh Court may ! F"[,tbe^pleased to take the affidavit on record and to^quash the^proceedings against i the Respondent Nos.^'1 and 2/Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Cr. No. 2540 of 2017 on the file of the SHO, P.S. Rajendranagar, Cyberabad in view of the Memorandum ) of Understanding dated 27.07.2022 entered into by and between the Petitioners and the 1"t Respondent, which has been recorded in the Terms of Compromise filed in O.S.'No. iezs ot 2017 on the file of the Learned Principal Senior Civil I Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar I This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of ;-il Grounds of Criminal^{Petitionand upon hearing the argumentsof Sri ZAINAB} ,i', '*' KHAN, Advocate forithe Petitioner in Crl.Petition and LA.NO.3 of 2023 and + Itit i^::, t .^{Respondent No.'l and 2 in l.A.No.4 of 2O23 and the PublicProsecutorfor the} B t-1..^j f.;^{Stateof :Telangana oir behalf of the Respondent No.2 in Crl.Petitionand} * : . 1i |.A.NO.3 of ;t2g8 and Respondent No.4 in l.A.No.4 ol 2023 and of Sri :",r1 Md.Nazeeruddin Khan, Advocate for the Respohdent No.2 in Crl.Petition and '. 1i;i .!^l.A.NO.3of 'r'-{^{2023and Petitioner in l.A.No.4 of 2023} I i-' . r&i t.. '1: , 4.4: The C-ourt niade the following: ORDER It't'

It't'

I ! : ]II I

THE H )IIOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K, SUF:I:NEIER

¶59

C. LIMINAL PETITION No.386 OF 2O2i, AL ),VG WITH I.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 21123

¶60

COMMON ORD]^IR

¶61

Thrs Crim n e1 Petition rs filed under Sec:io t^z-82 Cr.P.C.,

¶62

seeking to cllrES thr: proceedings rn Cnme No.25.1 I of 2017 on the file of the Stat,rn House Officer, Rajendra-ragzu' Police Station, Cyberabad. The rt.tit.ioners herein are accused Nos;. I & il in the said crlme The offer^r:,. s alleged against the petitioners, h,.'rein are under Sections 42(),^,lC r 458 and 47 I of the Indian I'enal C ode

¶63

Heard lerrr Lr,d counsel appearing on both sii l,. s rlnd learned Additional Publir Irrosecutor for the State. Pertrsed 1h,: rt:cord

¶64

Dunngl thr pendency of the present CrimLrLa.l F'etition, the parties have con p^-omised the matter and, ac,:ordin6rlv, respondent No.1/defacto c,:r LSrlainant Ii1ecl t..{.Nos.3 and^z.of 23.13 :o permit to compound the ol^,:rrces and to cornpromise the cast:

¶65

This Court lry order date<l 14.02.2023 rn IA No.5 of 2023 granted permisr crr to the :ln(r petitioner/l\2 to recresent^1st petitioner/A I

¶66

ai+,3

¶67

¶68

Though this Court vide order dated 1 1 .O 1.2023 and 14.02.2023, directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for their identification and also directed the Secretary to submit a report, the parties could not attend due to circumstances beyond their control and as such requested this Court to gralt permission to appear before the secretary, Telangarra High court Lega-r Services Committee. On 2a.O2.2023, this Court, as a last chance, again granted permission to the parties to appear before the Legal Services Committee. In compliance with the said order, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee has submitted his report, on 03.03.2023.

¶69

In the report of the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, it is stated that in obedience of the orders of this Court, the 1"r respondent, petitioner No.2/A2 on his behalf and on behalf of petitioner No.r/Al have appeared before him aJong with their counsel and on examination and verification of their particulars from their Aadhar Cards, they were tallied. Thus the identification of both the parties has been estabtished.

¶70

7 . The parties herein have filed a joint memo of compromise stating that at the intervention of the erders, they have settred the

¶71

disputes b,'t\'e r^'-hem amicably^{and 1"t resp o-tdt:trt has no} objectron to^qlra rh the^{proceedingsagainst th: petlti lncrs hereinin} the above Case.^{ll-re saicl joint metno of compi-omLs'e and the report} of the Secretar)'^{u 3} lllaced^{on reoord'}

¶72

B. In viet' tht^s;ai,C report^of the^{Secretary, Ielang:tna High Court} Legal Services; l,.rmmittec, Hyderabad, and als,: .n^{vieu' of the} iJt ' compromise ertt r :d betr,i een the^{petitioners ilnd1 e ;1)t ndent No. 1,} I.A.Nos.3 arrd 4 o'^{'.2023 zrre all,ru'ed. Consequentl.", the Criminal} Petition is :rllorv^'cl and the^{proceedingsCrimr: Nr:. 2:'i4O of '2077 on} the file of t'1e S a.ion^{House Ofllcer, Rajendr,rnrlSl:Lr I)olice Station,} Cyberabacl, ir16^{llcrt-'b1/qurashedztgainst the petit o:rers/A1 & A2'} Petitioners/A1 i A1l unclert.ake^{to pa)' an emolt;ll ol Rs 5,000/-} (Rupees Five T^()usand Only) to the^{Dire ctot', l:lainik Welfare,} Hyderabad (Sar rrgs^{A/c.No.52 188926279' fitatt: l:lar.k of India,} withir-r a perio,J^,f T:n^{DaYs frorntodal', and file pl''of of the same} into the Registry

¶73

As a sr-'q-rt ., th.e^{miscellaneous PetitionspetrJ:ng il any, shall}

¶74

stand close<l

¶75

Tid/- T. JAYASREE ASSII;'I'AN T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶76

S:C'TION OFFICER

¶77

To,

¶78

The Vlll lv4etropoli 'rr^{IVlagistrate Cyberabad at Rajend'anag:tr} 2. The Station Hourst^{C.fficer,Raiendra Nagar Police Stalion,tlytrerabad'}

¶79

aJ. Two CCs to^pUBL :^{PRoSECUToR, HighCourt for ttle Sta e cf l'elanganaat} Hyderabad [OPIJ(

¶80

,1
{lri 4. One ' CC ''l' to SRl. ZAINAB KHAN, Advocate [OPUC]
I
il : l, , 6. 5. Two One CD CC 5. Two One CD CC One CD CC CC Copiesto, SRl, Md. Nazeeruddin Khan, Advocate [OPUC]
i ',1,.
:ll t
,Av-' :i'
i . : ' i"'iil
'i .r i
L
'l' Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise

¶81

l, , 6. 5. Two One CD CC 5. Two One CD CC One CD CC CC to, SRl, Md. Nazeeruddin Khan, Advocate [OPUC]

¶82

¶83

NOTE: Amount^paid by SRI ZAINAB KHAN, Counsel for the^Petitioner towards imposed by Cost of Rs. 5,000 /- ( Rupees Five thousand^only )^{directed by the} Hon'ble:Court , dated 14.03.2023 lo the^{Director, SainikWelfare, Hyderabad(} Savings A,/c. No. 52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shanthinagar^{Branch & 20070,} IFSC Code : SB1N0020070, NICR Bi, 500004057) and^an amount^{of Rs.5,0001and} filed Memoof Proof of Compliance USR.No.3B371 of²⁰²³ dated:13.04.2023

¶84

i
I
[:,t: : :&',
'fi.
cqt,t "i, '']-,1,.
-
t, i. ,.c
i [ : h i l:" !!i. .,. ,a, .
4i7I &.{'r1r} i
li F i { "-rr:: Q6ai ' 1,.1-tf "
iS:,,
i4
1 E {. ?tH, ,., ...;ri
4b-i .-r ,
t'l.: !: ,- l ':
h,.
I
t
t
,,..
r
I
{.
+.'.Yi ,
t,' :
:i
{ i::,i

¶85

I t {I t II J 1 I i I I I

¶86

¶87

I .ll iiI ,i I + 1 ,7 f I i I I L I :

HIGH COUR'

DATED: 141A3,t2023

coMMoN otit)ER

CRLP.No.38( of 2023

AIONG'WtTl I^t.A.NO.3

¶93

,'<br>r1r StP ?$8 i
i
),
,.. |,.
jr, ,
.

¶94

AND 4 OF 20 I:}

¶95

¶96

ALLOWING I HE GRL.PETITION

¶97

i
I 5 AND I.A.NOS :t AND I.A.NOS :t AND :t AND AND 4 OF 2023.
I
1
,l,l ./t)-
t /4
(
it _--)
!
I prrl r '\ 1
i
t
I .'"- ,.r\r',>
f f .i4. .--r,\ r o'
I
i
t

¶98

5 AND I.A.NOS :t AND I.A.NOS :t AND :t AND AND 4 OF 2023.

¶99

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar v. Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Mogli Jagdish Kumar v. Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. B. R. Traders Vs State of Telangana and another

Chenna Vidyasagar Vs State of Telangana and 7 Others

V.Prabhakar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Chikkala Apoorva , Sankuri Apoorva Vs State of Telangana and another

Mr. Vegesna Chaitanya Kumar , Vegeshna Chaitanya Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and another

Karike Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana