The High Court dismissed a petition filed to quash and stay criminal proceedings as infructuous because the underlying criminal case (C.C.No.618 of 2010) had already been disposed of by the court below via contested acquittal.
The criminal petition to quash and stay proceedings was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY: THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8484OF 2014
Between:
Chennadi Rama Rao, S/o. SatyanarayanaRao, Joint Director (Retd) District lndustries Centre Adilabad R/o. H.No.9-5-145i3, Sapthagiri Colony Karimnagar ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
. ...Respondent
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ofGroundsof Criminal Petition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.618 of 2010 onthe file of the Court of the Hon'ble Additional Judicial Magistrateof FirstClass at Karimnagar against the petitioner
CRLPMP. NO: 8074OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminal Petition,the High Courtmaybe pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of thepetitioner/ accused in C.C.No.61B of 2O1O on the file of the courtof the Hon'ble Additional Judicial l\ilagistrate of First Class at Karimnagarpending disposalof the Criminal Petition
CRLPMP. NO: 13314 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the ltrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,theHigh Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay orders granted in Crl.P.MP.No.807412014in Crl.P.No.B484l2014 dated 18.09.2014 for furtherperiod
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Courtmaybe
pleased to pass a fresh orders granting stay in CC.No. 618 of 2010 on the flle of the Additional Judicial lvlagistrate of First Class, Karimnagar against the petitioner.
This Petition coming o1 for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D.LINGA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
J
t I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8484 of 2Ol4
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.618 of 2O1O on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Karimnagar.
2
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
criminal petition, shall stand closed
Sd/-P.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSTSTANI_FEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qD
)
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Karimnagar. '
Kj
HIGH COURT
DATED:041O712023
J
ORDER
srAre
1
o-
!-) ?
o Il2 SEPTTS C.
i L)
u
*\ Di 'r.r,-, C'." -,.,- - -\ r.,
CRLP.No.8484 ol 2O14
CRL.P. IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
$
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition to quash criminal proceedings is maintainable when the underlying trial has already been concluded.
Whether the petition to stay proceedings should be allowed when the trial has been disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chennadi Rama Rao
The State of Telangana
Gurram Sunder Rao
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
