Justice E.V. Venugopal permitted the petitioner to withdraw a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings. The petition was then dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THEEIGHTEENTH DAYOF JULY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITIoN NO: 12066OF 2014
Between:
NAYEET\4 KHAN,S/O Ameer Khan, aged33 years, Occ Business,Rl/o Tandur, Ranga Reddy District.
PETITIONER/ACCUSEDNo.7
AND
The State of Telangana,Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hvderabad
.....RES'.NDENTNo.1/coMpLAtNANT
PetitionUnderSection482ofCr.P'CprayingthatinthecircumstanCeS stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the Highcourt may 6e pre"""o toquash the proceedings against the_petitioner/ Accused No.7 in s.i.No.tzo of 2013on the file of Hon'ble Seniorcivil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District,in the interestof Justice.
CRL.P.MP . NO:12342 F 2014
PetitionUnderSection4S2ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the Highcourt may be pleased to stayall furtherproceedingsagainst the Petitioner/ Accused No.7 in S.c.No.t zo oI2013 on the file of Hon,ble SeniorCivil Judge at Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District,pending disposal of the criminal Petitionand paSSsuch othei or furtherOrder or Orders as this Hon'ble Court deemsfit'
This Petition coming onfor hearing, upon perusing the N/emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petitionand uponhearingthe arguments of Sri.H.sudhakara Rao, Advocate for thePetitionerand the AdditionalPublic Prosecutorfor the state of Telanganaon behalf of the Respondent No.1and Advocatefor the Respondent No.2 isNone APPeared.
The Court made the followingORDER
HON( URABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V.VENt'(i(,IPI.L CRI,I]NAL PETI TION No.12066 c'f 20'.t
ORDER:
This Clir rinal Petition is filed to callfor the records
pertaining t o !i ,l No.176 of 2013 pending on the file 'rf Senior Civil Judgt. /i1 arabad, Ranga Reddy District,and tt> quash the proceedir-rgs t f,.r r-ein.
M iscrllar ':ous petitions, if any,pending in this criminal petition, shall r lso stand closed
Sd/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTAI'ITIlEGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// il.; SE(;TiONOFFICER
\
To 1 TheHon'ble 2 TwoCC's to ,?'F,13#!ils33;,Yl:"'jl,'f3.[ft iygg!;f r;;['"1'iansanaat 3 Hvderabad. o'neCCto SI llllron"*u,.,Rao, Advocate[oPUCl 4 TwoCD Ct ries
SA
I I
HIGH CC]UFI '
DATED:'Bl0 12423
ORDER
1 r{F- S rAr 6
'7
2r [llB?m €t
, r'lz
\t^\1ri rr'., -,:r'
CRLP.No.12. e;6 of 2014
DISMISSIn-G T[ 0 CIUMINAL PE'IITION AS WITHDRA\I.,I WITHOUT COSTS.
L 1.,-)
Nayeet Khan
State of Telangana
Justice E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
