The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings as infructuous because the petitioner had already been acquitted by the Magistrate Court.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner's acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
RIMINAL P TION NO:8432OF m
Between:
R.S.RAMACHANDRA MURTY,HYD., S/o late R.V. Somanatha Sarma Aged70 years, occ: Consulting Engineer Rl/o.H.No.1-3-183/40/40 GandhiNagar, Hyderabad. T.S.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition'the High Court may be pleased to call for therecordsin C.C.No.568 of 2007 on the file of XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,Hyderabad, and quash thesame.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 8456 0F 2015)
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay allfurther proceedingsincluding the appearanceof the petitioner in C.C.No 568 of 2007 on the file ofXIV AdditionalMetropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad,pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition and pass such other order or orders asthis Hon'bleCourt may deemfit andproper in the circumstances of thecase.
This Petrtion coming on forhearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetitionand upon hearingthe argumentsof Sri K.R.Srinivas for Sri M V HANUiVIANTHARAO ,Advocatefor th€ Petitioner andthe Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalfof the Respondent No. 1, None Appearedfor the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUCTOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8432 OF 2015
OR.DER:
This criminal petition is ftled seeking to quash the C.C.No.568 of 2OO7 on the frle of XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
2
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SDA P.CH.NAGABH USHAMBA ASSTSTANTBEGTSTRAR /
.-
/
//TRUE COPY//
//TRUE COPY// *,,' ..',' ;ECTION
;ECTION OFFICER
To,
NO
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0511212023
ORDER
{ \A€ ST ATG o
(
q
o
I g rtB z$it .E
o,J
4i5
*
D L' i\ (-;
CRLP.No.8432 of 2O15
DlSSMISSING THE CR!MINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
ilL<br>r\tq\x
d'(
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed as infructuous in light of the petitioner's acquittal.
Whether there is any representation by the unofficial respondent to be heard after the petitioner's acquittal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.S. Ramachandra Murty
The State Of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
