Dismissed

Dodla Srinivas, Secunderabad., v. M/S. Paras Finance Corp., Hyd and Anr.

Telangana HC4 Dec 2023CRLP/7922/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court discharged Criminal Petition No. 7922 of 2015 filed under Section 482 CrPC. The court observed that the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates despite the matter being listed for dismissal. Holding that the petitioner was no longer interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to pursue alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to work out alternative remedies.

Dodla Srinivas, Secunderabad., Vs M/S. Paras Finance… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32se ]

¶2

IN THE fIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 79220F 2015

¶7

Between:

¶8

Dodla Srinivas, S/o Tirupataiah Aged years Occ Business No 12_g_3ggt6t2, Mettuguda, Secunderabad.

¶9

...REVISION PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

M/s. Paras Finance Corp., Rep by its GpA Mahaveer Kumar Jain S/o Parasmal Jain, aged 39 years OccBusiness, 6-1-g11ll, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 State of Telangana,, Rep by Public^prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 344 ol 2O14of learned lV Spi Magistrate, Hyderabad.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201s(CRLPMP- NO: 7878 F 20151

¶16

Petilion under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the firlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in cc No.344t2o14 on the fire of lV Spl. Magistrate Hyderabad.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N .Praveen Kumar ,Advocate for the petitioner and Sri K. Ramakrishnaiah the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri T.Shyam Sunder lVurthy Advocate for the Respondent No.1 .

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7922 of 20r5

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

None appears for the petitioner. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e., on 22.06.2023, 30.06.2023 and La.ll.2o23, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, though the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared for the petitioner.

¶23

Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter vigilantl5r and diligently any more, therefore, this criminal petition is liable to be dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶24

Leamed Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State is present.

¶25

Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed for nonprosecution, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out the alternative remedies as available under law.

¶26

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶27

closed.

¶28

SD/- K.AMMAJI GISTRAR ASSISTANT

¶29

//TRUE^COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶30

-o',

¶31

.n"^rv _soe*r l{1g::,..::: it,i:1.i,0?11,," ro,u"r

¶32

3 SlE33l3^{3,llT 5;',Iru;;;;;'rrrurtnvRovocare loPucl} t"qn^{Court for the Slate of}

¶33

4 Two CCs^{to Publrc} "r-"tll"ic,t - i"rungun'' l-lYderabad [oUTl

¶34

i"rungun'' l-lYderabad [oUTl

¶35

-n r-<-5.^{Two CD CoPies}

¶36

I I I i ,I t I i II I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:0411212023

ORDER

CRLP.No.7922 of 2015

1tr 9 sTATf o
q
oo [ 9 F'tB 2$21
* D L-i rl. ,

¶42

THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS NON- PROSECUTION

¶43

t1-<br>lili"

Dodla Srinivas, Secunderabad., v. M/S. Paras Finance Corp., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dodla Srinivas, Secunderabad., v. M/S. Paras Finance Corp., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Mallaiah and Others Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Banoth Shekhar Babu, Vs Sri G. Srinivas Rao

Sri Kandada Bakka Reddy and 9 Others Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Shama Bint Moosa , Shama Tabashum Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Md.Javeed Ansari Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

N. Karuna Kumar, Vs State of Telangana