Disposed

P. Barath Kumar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Sept 2023CRLP/8328/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court addressed a petition for anticipatory bail. Finding the prescribed punishment under Sections 381 and 506 IPC to be less than seven years, the Court directed the investigating officer to follow Section 41-A CrPC and supreme court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed off; direction to Investigating Officer to follow Section 41-A CrPC procedure.

P. Barath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO I-HOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABT,E SRI JUSTICE K,SURENDER

¶7

CRIMINAL PEIITION NO: 8328 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

'l P. Barath Kumar Reddy, S/o. P.Kotilinga Reddy Aged. 26 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.no.2-1 Ba, Kottapalli, Nandhya. Kurnooi, A. P.

¶10

P.Samanth Kumar Reddy, S/o Aged. 27 years. Occ. Business, R/o P.No.491 and 500, Raja Rajeshwari Nagar, Kondapur, Near Durga Temple, Kondapur. Gachibowli. Hyderabad, T.S.

¶11

... Petition erslAcc used No.1

¶12

And

¶13

The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Thrcugh Station House Offrcer, Miyapur Police Station,

¶14

... RespondenUC omplaina nt

¶15

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station to release the petitioners/A,1 and A.2 on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No 93212023 of Miyapur Police Station.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G Vishnu Vardhan Reddy. Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

I \

¶20

THT ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SI]REI( DEF.

¶21

CtIIMINAL PETITION No. 8328 of 2023

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

'll'ris C rirninal Pctition is filed und.,'r Sectior, 438 of Cr.P.C. by petitioners/ Accu serl Nos. I and 2 se el<inq bail in the eve nt of their arrest in connectior-r with Crirn,: Ir o.932 of 2023 on the lile ol Miyapr-rr Police St.etion. Cyrerabad, registered fo r the offences pr,rnishable under ir ctions 38 1 ar-rd 506 rear riith 34 ol IPC.

¶24

Heard earned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional P rtriic Prosecutor lcrr the resr,onde nt - Sl ate and perused the record.

¶25

On pe^-usal of the record, since the punishment prescribed fo' the oflences alleged against these petit oners is less than se,ren years, this Court deems it aJrpropriate to direct the Investigating Olficer in Crime Nc,.932 212:l on the file of Banjalahills Police Station, Hyderairad, ,o follorv the procedure laiC do.*,n uncler Section 41 A C-.P.C and also the guidelines fc rmulatecl by thr: Hon'ble Sr,rprenre C ourt in

¶26

¶27

¶28

Arnesh Kunta.r v, Sta.te of Bihart scrupulousll . Hou'cvcr, the petitioners shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer l;r' furnisl-ring informatior-r and documents as sought by him in concluding the investigation.

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed off. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed

¶30

SD/-T. JAYAEREE A,SSISTANT REGISTRAR / ,TRUE COPY// U SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To.

¶32

1 . The Vlll Additional Metropolilan^{Magistrate, Kukatpally, Hyderabad}

¶33

The Station House Officer, Miyapur^{Police Station, Hyderabad.}

¶34

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor,^{High Court of Telangana,} [OUT]

¶35

One CC to Sri. G Vishnu VarChan^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶36

Two CD Copies.

Jgk

6v^=-

I (2014) 8 scc 273

HIGH COURT

DATED:06/09/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.8328^{ot 2C2l</sup>}

¶44

-a
/,:.
Li
1t sEPzm i)7-
i
.l-
'1.
\ ..1 i-.,=..--'- )

¶45

CRIMINAL PETITIOI,I^{IS DISPOSED OF}

¶46

/' 4;7.)
l4l
\^fr-
1q 'vt
\Z

P. Barath Kumar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Barath Kumar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.v.Babu Vs State of Telangana and another

G.Srikanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Dommeti Venkata Swamy Vs The Sate of Telangana

Vaidehi , Devamma and Another Vs the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P and Another

G.Shankar Rao Vs the State of Telangana and Another

A. Parusha Ramudu Alias a. Ramudu, Vs The State of Telangana