Disposed

G.Srikanth Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Sept 2023CRLP/7067/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash proceedings for cheque bouncing. The court noted Supreme Court observations on limitation and directed the trial court to keep the issue open, without finally disposing the petition or granting quashing in this order.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition disposed off; miscellaneous applications, if any, closed. No quashing granted in this order.

G.Srikanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7067 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.Srikanth Reddy, S/o G. Bal Reddy, Aged about. 48 Years, Occ: police Constable, Rl/o. Flat No.405, H.No.6-13-10, 4'n Floor, Sri Nilayam Apartment, beside Pasula Kista Reddy Function Hall, Bhageeratha Colony, Mahabubnagar.

¶9

...PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad, Through Station House Officer Rural P_S., Mahabubnagar.

¶12

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶13

T.Bal Raju @ VPT Bal Raju, S/o Late Veeranna, Aged about. 56 years, Occ:LlC Agent and Business, R/o. H.No.8-6-123/1ic, Mahabubnagar.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash C.C No.573/20'lg on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class (for proh and Excise) at Mahabubnagar, Telangana State.

¶16

LA. NO: 1OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.573i2019 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class (for Proh and Excise) at Mahabubnagar, Telangana State.

¶18

t.A. NO 10F 2023

¶19

Petition under section- 4 92 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lMemorandum of Grounds of Crininal Fetition, flr" Hi;h a;;,1 -^';;y be pleased to amend the euash petiti_on and prayer by substituiing- G number and name of the cou,t from "c.c.No.[;lstzors on the fire or ti" Cor.t ";;"or Judicial lvlagistrate of First crass (for proh & Excise) at r,rr,hlnrnr,rg".' t "c.c.No.113012022 on the fire of the court cf rv Additionar Lrni* crrir iiog" cum lV Addl. JMFC, Mahabubnagar.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri cHAITHAN'A K, Advocate for the petitioner and the Additionar pubric Prosecutor for the state of rerangana at Hyder,rbad on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and M SAROJ REDDY, for the Respondent No.2

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7O67 oF 2O2L

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

¶26

This Criminai Pe tition is liled under Secrron 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedrrre, 1973 (for short 'Cr.i,.C.') by the petition er/ Accu sed, to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.ll3Ol2022 on the filc oi IV Additional Junror Civil Judgecum-lV Additional .iudiciai Magistrate of First Class at Mahabubnagar. Ti're offerrces alleged against him are under Section i3B of tl-re Ncgotiable lnstrumcnts Act arrd 42O of the Indian Penal Code.

¶27

Heard learned counsel lor the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor lor the respondent - State. Perused the record.

¶28

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the Honourable Supreme Court in Yogesh Jain a. Sumesh Chadhat has kept open the scope of deciding whether the debt is time barred or not to the trial Court

¶29

I 2022 Livclaw sc 879

¶30

¶31

The sar, observatior.r o[ the Honour:rl;le Supreme Court

¶32

shall be follorved by the trial Court 5. With the above obscn,ation the Cr-iminal Petition is

¶33

disposed off

¶34

MiscelleLneous applications pending, il any, shall stand

¶35

closed.

¶36

Sd/- B. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COP}7/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judicial lvlagistrate of First Class (Proh. & Excise) at Mahabubnagar. 2. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Hyderabad touTl

¶42

One CC to SRl. CHAITHANYA K, Advocale [OPUC]

¶43

One CC to SRl. M SAROJ REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶44

Two CD Copies

¶45

prVH^\m

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0510912023

.. ie ij
i.u:,'
,. j TE i,'

ORDER

CRLP.No.7067 of 2021

DISPOSING OFF

THE CRL.PETITON

g^c'C% \o¹⁾

G.Srikanth Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Srikanth Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Anitha Grace Vs The State of Telangana

Dastaglrl @ Kurva Dastagiri Vs The State of Telangana

Gudipati Thirupathi Reddy Vs The state of Telangana

M.v.Babu Vs State of Telangana and another

Dommeti Venkata Swamy Vs The Sate of Telangana

Mohd Qamar Hussain Vs Ruksana Sultana and State of Telangana, Rep by P.P