Court quashed criminal proceedings against petitioner alleging cheating and forgery in regard to a registered sale agreement where the vendor's signature was forged and he was represented by a GPA holder.
Criminal Petition allowed quashing in CC No. 4507 of 2019
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
v t:
I I II N tmr I nrca couRT FoR THE srATE oF TELANGANA , ATHYDERABAD 1 THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
I PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 823s OF 2019
Between:
i Buddaram Sudhakar, S/ci Late 8.L. Chary, Aged about 63 years, Occ Business, ,Ryo Flat No.202, Arnar Chand Sharma Complex, SABge_d,999!r,n-dqq?q,' : ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 ANDi I
LA" NO:1OF2019. ,l;t r' ik,,r:i i, ' ,!
',{,.., e"tition"rnderisectiii,,+ez 'it'cr.p.cprayingthat in thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the tligh Court may be phased to! dispense with the Original Certified copy of charge sheet in C.C No.4507 ot,2019, on the file of the XVll-Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate,Hyderabad at Nampalli,
A" 2 2019
i.r.Petitionunder Section482 of CI.P.C pr'ayingthat in the circumstances $Ated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all fulther proc€edings in C.C No.45O7 of 2019, on the fde of the XVll-Addl.lMetropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Nampally, for the offenoe Under/Seci42Oi Ryw 34 IPC and 156(3) Cr.P.C, Pending disposal of theCrirninal { t.t 'iflllll,f;r I.,, . J il.,*,, ii$i : i{flftrisf eetition;i<iming?onforftearirigTlionperusing the Memorandum of 'Gibunds of-Criminal Petition-and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ayesha Siba,tAdvdcate for thA Petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor onbetralf ofthe Risponoerit No.1 and of None appea{s for the Respondentl,lo.2
"t'r:.i { h :
The Court made the following: ORDER '
-. '.:
,1. I
', 4-.: ... , .9,:,,.. .!,.' . .i.
;;!&-:i, r -.- -Ii
?t f'.: r.' :I;:;: gt,i'
i., .1. i ,i. i
.1, I
-. ::
"
,!-* :. : .* lil ,. .j
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8235 OF 2Or9
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is hled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,Cr.p.C.J by the petitioner/A 1 to quash the proceedings against him in CC.No.45O7 of 2OI9 on the file of XVII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Nampally. The olfences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 42O r/w.34 of the Indian penal Code.
;1 : fi
)
\w
)
I I
I I
favour of this petitioner and two others, along with seven other vendors.
4
Miscellaneous applicationspending,ifany, shall stand
closed.
sD/-K. MAJI ASSISTANT R TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OF ER
To,
j'1: The XVll.Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Nampally, IZ. fneStation House Of{icer, Eegum Bazar Police Station, l'lyderabad. i 3.One CC to Sri Ayesha Saba,Advocate [OPUC] , l4: Two'CCs toPublic Prosecutor,HighCourt for the Stateof Telangana (OUT) i Is: TwotD coDies
MYr't
'h,InrI ,{' } 1 f:
ri]
I F fI ,! i L
it ;
HIGH COURT
t
i
i
.a
,t I {
t
t
aI
KS, J
,1 t{,I
t
OATED:1611112023
:
ORDER,
i.
,{i i
a l
't t
J ,fu I
I
CRLP.No. 5 of 2019
,l;.. J
ifi,,t1. :
ls ALL.*ED'
"1,r,oi"=r,oN
tIt.
.1
i
l
i&i
't:r
H*
I
il
I
;i! .il ,+ll ,I
+trt t
) *I :
.i.
it 1t
a<br>5 (
rs
e S.[ATE
q o
f 1 B ,l[\ 1$2[
o +t
-I
l sPrfl C<br>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether registered sale agreement with forged signatures justifies proceedings for cheating and forgery.
Whether the petitioner's knowledge of the agreement bars the offence of cheating.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Buddaram Sudhakar
The State of Telangana
Jaber Bin Awadt
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
