Disposed

Smt G Raj Kumari v. the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P and Another

Telangana HC26 Sept 2023CRLP/8203/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings. The Court noted no appearance by the petitioner and directed the learned Additional Public Prosecutor to examine the completed prosecution evidence before a decision could be made, leading to the disposal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was disposed of because the petitioner did not appear and prosecution evidence had already been examined by the trial court.

Smt G Raj Kumari Vs the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

jI I I I I I I i 1

¶2

i i I I

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

Between:

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:8203 0F 2017

¶8

!mt.^{G. Raj Kumari,Wo. Sri Gopinath,aged} 59^years, Occ: Retd. Employee, R/o. Plot No:203, ill-Floor, Akash Bhalrani Rlsidency, rast H,{ardiplnv, Nehrunagar, Secunderabad - 500026, Telanagana State, Temporarily ,;.idi;;;i H.No.2-22-8, Near Venkateswara Nursing H6me, Gandhari Vittag" a M;;;r: Kamareddy District, Telangana State.

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITiONER/ACCUSED

¶11

The State of Telangana, rep by its public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

2 Smt. Prishpa Gudur Khan, W/o. Khan Md. Sadullah, aged 60 years, Occ: Retd. Emptoyee, R/o. H.No.B-203, Datkania J.N.Road, S"nt, ir* ie""tl, Mumbai, Maharashtra State, presenfly Rl/o. 1_8_30 3t23, Devi nosiet toi Women, P.G.Road, Secunderabad, Telahgana State.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶15

Petition under section 4g2 0t cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition, the High df ;;y be pleased to call for the records relating to c_c.No..lg of 2017 on'ihe file of the XXll Additional chief Metroporitan lvlagistrate court at Secunderabad unJer Sections 40, 468, 471 and 42O ot l.p.C and quash the proceeding" tn"rn against the petitioner / accused.

¶16

CRLPMP. Noi 8735 OF 2017

¶17

Petition under Section 4g2 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition, th. High Co;;;;y be pleased to grant stay of a[ further proceedings incruding ttr-e arresi ano 3-?pga.rqnce^{of the petitioner/ accusedin c.c.No.1-8} 0f 2017;n the fire;f lhe XXll Additional chief Metrpolitan Magistrate court at Secunderabad p"noing disposal of the main Criminal petition.

¶18

^ -This -Petition^{comingon for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of criminar petition and upon-hearing the arguments of sri. G.R. SUDHAKAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of t[e Additionar pubric prosecutor for the state of rerangana.on -beharf^{of the Respondent No.1 and Dr. e. naano;} Kumar, for the RespondentNo.2.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

I l l l

¶21

TIIE TIONOURABLE SRI .TISTICE K.SURENDER c IVAL TIONNo. 8203 OF 2o77

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

The Criminal petition is filed under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal procedur.e (fi;r short Cr.p.C.) by the petitioner/Accused to quash the proceedings in c.c No.g2o3 of 2OlZ on the lile of the X)fiI Additional Chief Metropoiitan Magistrate at Secunderabad. The alleged offences against accused are punishable under Sections 406,46g,421 and 42O of Indian penal Code.

¶24

2 None appeared for the petitioner

¶25

Leamed Adclitional public prosecutor on instrucdons would submit that examination of the u.itn in the trial court is completed and the case is ,"",;';t"*s or examination of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.p.C. Since, the evidence has been brought on record by the prosecution, it is for the trial Court to decide the case on the basis of said e,zidence, whether offences made out against the petitioner or not.

¶26

4 Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed ol.

closed. I

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶31

SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -./ //TRUE COPY// cd+ '/'

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

1 The XXll Additional Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Secunderabad.} 2 One CC to Sri. G.R. SUDHAKAR,^Advocate [OPUC]. 3 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,^{High Court of Telangana,Hyderabad} louTl.

¶35

4 Two CD Copies. 5 One ."yspare copy.

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2610912023

ORDER

STATE
oA
:q 2$8 o
sLg
t 1 .+
o
t
+
I o PA1

¶40

CRLP.No.8203 of 2O17

¶41

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED^OF

Smt G Raj Kumari v. the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt G Raj Kumari v. the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Talasila Vijaya Mohan Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Siripuram Pavan Vs State of Telangana and another

Smt. Kota Vijay Kumari Vs The State of Telangana

Gande Vishwa Madav Rao Vs Gande Laxmi Devi (Died)

Gande Vishnu Madhav Rao through his G.P.a, Gande Bhanu Madhav Rao Vs Puppala Chinthamani

M/s. Shree Diamond Vs The State of Telangana