This criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings for cheque dishonour was disposed of promptly as the trial court had been abolished and no reason existed for keeping the petition pending.
The criminal petition is disposed of giving liberty to move the court if the cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYTHREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:4599OF2017
Between:
...petitioner/Accused
...Respondenucomplainants
Petition under Section482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may be to quash all furtherproceedingsagainstthe petitioners hereinin ;i;r;; lonnection *itn CCNO. 285 of 2016 on the file of XXI Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
l.A NO:2 oF 20'17(CRLPMP.NO:4490OF20171
Petition under Section482 of Cr.P'Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may be pi"".LJ t" quash the CCNo. 285 ol 2016on the file of XXI SpecialMagistrate' Eii"*"nrir, i{yderabadincludingthe appearance of the petitioners herein, pending disposal of t[,iil *r,"g onfor hearing,upon perusing the Memorandumrcf Grounds of criminalpetition and upon hLaring the arguments of Sri_sATlSH KUMAR BIJAPURI,Advocate for ihe Petitione(notbeingnresent)'-l1b]i9 p..""rtoi, on behalf of the Respondent No'1 and SriV RAMAKRISHNA REDDY for the RespondentNo.2
The Court madethe following:ORDER
I I
THE HONOURABLESRI .II'STICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4.599 OF 2OL7
ORDER:
The Criminal Petitionis filed under Section 482 of the Code of CriminalProcedure (for shortCr.P.C.) bythe petitioners/AccusedNos. 1 tt, 3 to qrrash the proceedingsin C.C.No.285 of2016 on the lile of the, XXI Special Magistrate, Errarnanzll, Hyderabad.The alleged ,rffencesagainstaccused are punishable underSections 138 of NegotiableInstruments Act.
2
Miscellaneousapplications pending, if any' shall stand
closed.
Sd/.V. KAVITHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
\
/TTRUECOPY/I
@
SECTIONOFFICER
SP
B
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2610912023
ORDER
CRLP.No.4599 of 2017
1 gE S'iA;.r
of,
\r; [ 3 tt0u ?un ai7-
i
I-li o,^T i-.r'i'i -a/
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
qi"'
@
ro
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the abolition of the trial court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Shree Diamond
M/s. Gupta Gold
Z. Mayur Tiwari
Archana
The State of Telangana
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
