This order is a single-line disposition dismissing a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings. The court ruled the petition infructuous because the petitioner had already been acquitted in the same case on June 6, 2022, rendering further proceedings unnecessary as stated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32ee l
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE TWENTIETHDAYOF JULY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI ]USTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRI INALPETITIO NO: 79590F2015
Between:
Yellapragada MaruthiAravind,S/o. -KrishnaPrabhakar' a9e 27 .years' o;;F;*'"i;-Emplovee, R/o.FlitNo'18/3, .23-30-6/A'Sri Sai Residencv' X;;;[;;;i, vEeini'satvatiaravanapuram,Vijavawada,KrishnaDistrict'
'..PETITIONER/ACCUSEDNo'1
AND
...RESPON DENTS/COMPLAINANTS
petition under section 4g2 of cr.P.C praying thatin the circumstances stated in theMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court rnuy bepleasedtoquash theproceedingsof the chargesheet' ,iJ" C.c.No.909of )otqagainst so far asconcernedtothe petitioner/ Accused No.1 on the file of thecourt of the I Additional ludicial First Class Magistrateat Khammam , KhammamDistrict'
N o P N o
Petition under Section482 of C('P'C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may bepleased to stay all furtherproceedings of the chargesheet ' ;i;; C.i. No.9o9ot' zotq againsi so far asconcerned tothe p"lition"V Accused ruo.f on the fileof theCourt ofthe I AdditionalJudicialFirstalabs Magistrate.at Khammam 'Khammam District pending disposal ofthe quash petition'
This Petitioncoming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri Pulla RaoYellanki, Advocatefor the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali' Assistant PublicProsecutor on behalf of the RespondentNo'1 and Sri Dr. ChallaSrinivasa Reddy, Advocatefor the Respondent No 2
The court madethe following:oRDER
I
THE HON )I,RABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. V.}I{UI}OPAL
CRI vIINAL PETITION No.7959 OF:2rl)lt;
ORDER:
Ther pr'- s r t Criminal PctiLion is liledrtn<lc rllc'c ion 482 of Cr.P.C. scc'lti:r to quash tltt'proceeciings (,1 r:hztrrit: shet:t, vide C.C.No.9(l'r r,l .,Ol'1 in so fiu-rts thepeti:ioltc:'/rct r-tsecl No.1 concenrc(r on lre file oltl-re lcarned IAdd tional .lr-r,iici:Ll First Class M:rgrslr' Ir], at l(hamm:rnl,KhammzmDis;trit:t pcnding disposal of tlrr' 1r rashpetition
- ________---\ '{
2
Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court), Khammam has been disposed of vide judgment dated 06.06 .2022 by acquitting the petitioner/ accused No.1 after due contest. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal petition as infructuous
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed
sd/- B. SARASWATHT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / lTRUECoPYI I
CJD
SECTION OFFICER
To,
STB \ kam ),
HIGH COUR-
DATED:20/07 /2023
ORDER
.-1 --:a=:. ,.'r+
,,', .- 1 oa
/,'i
'2
ta) 2
\ t: ? I NIlj 2tr8
L
tc
a<br>
CRLP.No.79ag of 2015
CRTMINAL PI I"ITION IS DISMISSED I S INFRUCTUOUS
slr-i" (\tr"
d*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings are to be maintained given that the petitioner has already been acquitted in the same case by a lower court.
Yellapragada Maruthi Aravind
The State of Telangana
Valluri Swathi
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
