Disposed

Mr. Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao v. State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC27 Feb 2023CRLP/9767/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to apply under Section 205 Cr.P.C. for bail, and consequently disposed of the petition without adjudicating the merits or granting quashment.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition disposed of; petition to move Trial Court under Section 205 Cr.P.C. for bail considerations.

Mr. Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao Vs State of Telangana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF^FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9767 oF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mr. Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao, S/o. Venkat Rao, Aged about 56^years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H.No. 3-7, Naspur, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Persecutor, High Court of Judicature, Hyderabad, Through P.S. CCC Naspur.

¶12

Kundarapu Kistaiah, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Rekurthi Village, Karimnagar District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all the proceedings in CC No. 211 ot 2021 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Mancherial, for the offences Under Section 42O,290, and 506 of IPC against pelitioner/Accused.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2OF 2021

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all furlher proceedings in CC No.21 112021 on the file of Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mancherial, for the offences Under Section 420, 290, and 506 of IPC against petitioner/Accused including the appearance of petitioner.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Padala Pravin Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE {ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶20

IRIMINAL PETITION No.9767 0f atozt

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This⁽ rimLnal Fbtition is filed under. Sec, on lg2 of the Code of Cr minal Procedure, l9Z3 (for sho -t^,Cr.p.C. ) to quash the l rocr:edings in C.C.No.2ll of 2021 on the file of learned Acld tional Judicial First Class Magistre r.r., Irlancherial filed again! [ petitioner/ Accused for tlte o.]i,rnc:s under Sections 42( .'29O anrl 506 ot the Indian penal ,l:ode (for short IPCJ.

¶23

Heard :irrned counsel for the petitioner/ a:c us,:d as well as learned A lclitional Public Prosecutor for the rr:s1;ondent - State. Perus 'd the record.

¶24

Learne< counsel for the pe titioner/ ac I lrse,i would submit thi t an Advocate would rel)r.esent the petitioner/ac used

¶25

In the cvcnt rtf the petitioner/ accust:,i f iling an application u rder Seclion 205 of Cr.P.C., thr: seL:-ne shall be considered by the Trial Court on conditions

¶26

Accordingly, Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶27

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶28

closed.

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

Sd/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR q,)

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To,

¶33

'1 . The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Mancherial.

¶34

The Station House Officer, PS, CCS, Naspur.

¶35

One CC to Sri Padala Pravin Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶37

Two CD Copies gbr

'.t

HIGH COURT

DATED:27l02120 t3

i t,: - ._r
ri'i
: .ii.r 1
Ir,

¶42

ORDER

¶43

CRLP.No.9767 o, 2021

¶44

DISPOS]NG OF T IE CRIMINAL PETITION

Mr. Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao v. State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao v. State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bandi Srikanth Yadav Vs Makken Rajendar Singh

K.Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Akbar Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana and another

Safdar Ali Mirza Vs The State of Telangana and another

Bestha Ramachadra Pankaj Vs State of Telangana

Budida Krishna Goud Vs The State of Telangana