Criminal Petition filed by accused to quash proceedings under Sections 504, 506 IPC and SC/ST POA Act was dismissed as infructuous because charge sheet was filed and Special Cell was assigned.
Criminal Petition No.7605 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
WEDNESDAY, THEFOURTEENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT IUSTICEG.ANUPAMACHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO:7605OF 2022
Between:
Mr. Taduri Venkat Reddy, S/o.T. Buchi Reddy,Aged about 48 years.Occ Business' R/o. Flat No.305 A, tenionBlock,TangrillaHbmel, Pragathi Nagar, Mansoorrabad' Hayah.ragar, R.R. District,Telangana.
...PETITIONETVACCUSED
AND
;.. RESPONDENryCOMPL AINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toquash the Proceedings in Crime No.457 of 2022 dated 16.08.2022 on the file of RespondentNo.1 P.S. Choutuppal, Rachakonda District, State of Telangana, for the offences punishable Under Sections 504,506 of IPC and Sec 3(1)(r)(s) of SC & ST POA Act 2015. Against thc PeLitioner.
I.A. NO:2OF20ZZ
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of further proceedings Crime No. 457 of 2022 dated 16.08.2022 on the file of Respondent No.1 P.S. Choutuppal, Rachakonda District, State of Telangana, for thc offences punishable Under Sectioru 504,506 of IPC & Sec 3(1)(r)(s) of SC & ST POA Act 2015. Against the Petitioner including stay of arrest and personal appearance penc{ing disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing tlrc Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Peridon and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Naraparaju Avaneesh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of thc Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Rcspondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINIAL PETITION No.76O5 of 2o22
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Crimin:Ll Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner vvho is arrayecl as Accused to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.457 of 2022 on the file of Stzrtion House Officer, Choutuppal Police Station, Rachakonda,registered for the offences punishable under Sections 5O4 and 506 ofIndian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC ST POA Act.2015.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any,sl-rall stand closed.
Sd/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /ITRUECOPY// t-lI) SECTION OFFICER
To,
CHG
Pm cr.
HIGH COURT
DATED:I4/06/2023
oRpER
CRLP.No.7605 of 2022
D^
I
i rB [u$Nn
\j:
),+
::-r,i-^-.-,-- r,l' i.'.
_{-:-_ .. .: ,
CRIMINAL PETITION IS
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
lne' ,*l+lcz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings survives adjudication after filing of charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Taduri Venkat Reddy
The State of Telangana
Sudakar Peddala
G. Anupama Chakravarty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
