Dismissed
Vijay Mansukhani v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCCRLP/7437/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:7437 0F 2018
Between:
...PET|TIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 to 3
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the charge sheet as filed against the petitioners/Accused 1
to 3 in c c No. 92 of 2017 on the fire of the Judiciar First crass Magistrate, At Mahabubnagar and Set-aside the same.
l.A NO:1 o F 2018
Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr. p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, he High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in c.c. No. 92 of 2017 or the File of the judicial First class Magistrate, At Mahabubnagar incruding the appearance of the petitioners/ Accused No. 'r to 3 in the interest of justice pending disposar of the above criminal petition.
I.A.NO.1 0F 2021 IN I.A.NO.1 0F 2020 IN CRL.P NO; 7437 OF ZO1A
Between:
1 The State of Telangana, Rep.lts public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
...PETIT]ONER/RESPONDENT
AND
:..RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED.
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT.
(R-4 is not necessary party)
r.A. NO: 10F 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacale the stay in tA No.1/2020 in crt.p No.743tt2o1| on the file of Hon'ble High Court dt: OOl2l2O2O
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri pRAMOD KUMAR KED|A,Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri V M M CHARY Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
---v
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.7437 0F 20LA
ORDER:
SD/- P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. The JudicialFirst ClassMagistrate' At Mahabubnagar i. iil;-l;S;;"r or poticelstaiiinHouseofficer ll Town PoliceStation'
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.7437 of 2018
1 BE STA 16:
(
q l'
o O 6 JAN
2024 f
F (,
THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
2^
1. Vrlay Mansukhani, 2. Gulu Mirchandani, 3. Smt. Ayesha Manusukhani
The State of Telangana, Rep. its public prosecutor
K. SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court