High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings in S.C.No.30 of 2017 arising under SC/ST (POA) Act, noting non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
Quashing of proceedings in S.C.No.30 of 2017 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I 1r
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Criminal Petition No.6946 of 20'19
Between:
AND
... Respondent.
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in S.C.No.30 of 2017 on the file of the VII Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Warangal.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including personal appearance of the petitioners in S.C.No.30 of 2017 on the file of Vll Additional Sessions Judge cum
Special Judge for cases underSC/ST(POA) Act' Warangal, pending quash petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ofGroundsof Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend thestay granted in Crl.P.No.6946 of 2019dated 3111O12O19 until further orders.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to extend staygranted in Crl.P.No.6946of 2O1g dated 31-10-2019 until further orders.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition andupon hearingthe arguments of Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy, Advocate for the Petit'ronerand the Public Prosecutoron behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri R.Mangulal,Advocatefor the Respondent No.1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
THE HONOURABLESRI WSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6946OF 2Ol9
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition underSection482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(for short'Cr'P.C.'),is hled by the petitioners-accused Nos. 1 to 7 toquashthe proceedings against them in S.C.No.3Oof 2Ol7 pending on the file of learned VU AdditionalSessions Judge-cum-SpecialJudge for cases under SC/ST(POA) Act, Warangal.
Miscellaneous applicationspending, ifany, shall I
stand closed. SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //rRuEcoPY/t' :tr'"
SECTIONOFFICER
SC/ST(POA) Act, Warangal'Act, Warangal'Warangal' 2. Thestation nouse ofrc-er,-zanargadhPolice q9!9l.w""ngalurban'- -ev+{ '
\c"'-
1
HIGH COURT
KS,J
DATED:O211112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6946 of 2019
slArE I F
{
7
ij
i:, I
fco tt ttt ND
i
I PP- '-'r'1 I'
Dismissing the Criminal Petition for non-prosecution.
a."q4% ffi"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings under SC/ST (POA) Act should be quashed for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chilagani Bixapathi and others
State of Telangana
Lokini Krishna Murthy
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
