Sirigiri Narasimha, v. Kavitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Telangana dismissed the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the cause did not survive for adjudication.
The High Court of Telangana dismissed the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6082 OF 2018
Between:
Sirigiri Narasimha, Occ. Rtd., Employee, R/o. H.No. 1-27-276, Bapuji Nagar, llew Bowenpalli, Secunderabad, Hyderabad District.
...PETTTIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof CriminalPetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to QUASH the Criminalproceedingsin CC.No.3212018on the file of Court of XV Addl. Chief Metropolitanlitlagistrate,Hyderabad and pass
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Courtmay bepleased to stay of all furtherproceedingsincluding theappearance of Petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.32l2O18 on the fileof the Courtof XV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad till the disposalof main CriminalPetitionand pass
t.A. NOr 2oF 20 18
petition under Sec stated in the Memorandr;t,on- lt,of cr.p.cpraying that in the cjrcumstances Pe".n,he H sh ;; ;:, :;,:,:::: :##:i6:T,:"::ilI' petition. I further o""", o"no,nt;:r".": ;;*H ::ffi:i '/^ Thispetition comino on r.rr h^^-:- _ crounds o, ar,r,nr, J";;;::-": ror hearing' upon perusins the Memorandum of and upon hearins the i Rao Gudiseva, oorl""i"'r1"" or the Petitionet"noinu''t"numentsof sri Narasimha the Respondent No.2 and beharr or rone appeared ror the Reslllcdl:'r:::"'on
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
\ -/^
/
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6O82 OF 2C118
ORDER:
1 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this Criminal Petition does not survive for
adjudication and has become infructuous
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
closed.
Sd/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT LEGI9TRAR ,]L/
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
g
,
l1
HIGH COURT
DATED:01/11/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6082 of 2018
1ri e srAI€
q
of,
r-) 0 4 J[l'l 2024 .6,
,..-
*
t
D o
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION ASINFRUCTUOUS
Gil'c"+
2a
A
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition survives for adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sirigiri Narasimha
The State of Telangana
Kavitha
K. SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court