The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous at the instance of the petitioner's counsel submitting the cause no longer warranted adjudication.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
cRtM|NAL PETTTION NO: 6934_!0E2Q1E
Between:
G. Madhukar, Occ. Nil, Fl/o. Residing aspaying Guest on ad-hocbasis With faculty providers.
... PETTTTONERyACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to allow thisquash.petition bysetting asidethe order Passedby the Honorable Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberbbadin Crl.M.P.No.1461of 2016 in D.V.C.No.2 of 2010, Honble whereby and whereunderthe Learned Magistrate directed this Petitioner to Pay the arrears amount of Rs74,000/- Plusthe maintenance amounts from the month of September2015 toApril 2016' confirmed by the Honorable lll AdditionalDistrict Sessions Judgeat LB Nagar, R.R District andpass
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may be pleased stay the orderpassed by the HonorableXl MetropolitanMagistrate, Cyberabad in Crl.M.P.No.1461ot 2016 in D.V.C No. 2 of 2010, where by and where under the LearnedMagistratedirected this Petitioner to Pay the arrears
amount 74,o0ol- Plus the maintenance amounts from the month of September 2015 to April 2016, till the disposal of the criminal Application, confirmed by Honorable lll Additional District and Sessions Judge at LB Nagar, R.R District and pass
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri M. Rathan singh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6934 0F 2018
ORD ER:
1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this Criminal petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous
3 Miscellaneous petitions, pending if aly, shall stand
closed
SD/- K. VENK.AIAH ASSISTANT R GISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
sEcTro OFFICER
To,
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0111112023
STATE
{ lr'E
f t? utt ?$8 o
o
*{,i
'-o
i
DESp^
ORDER
CRLP.No.6934 ot 2018
Dismissing the Criminal petition
as infructuous
ioL
&o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. survives for adjudication given counsel's submission that it became infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Madhukar
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
G. Seetha @ Swetha
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
