Disposed

Smt. N. Mamatha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Jul 2023CRLP/6610/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court declined to quash FIR No. 374 of 2023 or stay proceedings as the alleged offences carry less than seven years imprisonment. Directions issued for accused to appear before Investigating Officer within four days while adhering to Arnesh Kumar guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to appear before Investigating Officer on 12.08.2023 between 11:00 and 1:00 PM; Criminal Petition disposed of without quashing FIR.

Smt. N. Mamatha Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

132541

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY.THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6610 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Qmt N Mamatha, W/o. Late. Shyam Babu yadav, Age 31 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 2-29, Hamidulla Nagar Village, Shamshabad ltlanAil, nanga RedOl Diskict -501218.

¶10

2 B. Venkatesh Yadav, S/o. Late. B Sattaiah, Age.54 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H. !^o: ^2.--29,^{HamidullaNagar Village, Shamshrbadv-andal,RangJReddyb;strict_} 501218.

¶11

J 9mt.^{B. Andalou,Wo. B. Venkatesh Yadav,Age.50 years, Occ. Household,} Rl/o. H. yg, ^2.-?9, Hamidulla Nagar Village, Shamshabad tvt'andat, Ranga Reddy bistrict _ 501218.

¶12

B. Prasanth Yadav, S/o. B. Venkatesh Yadav, Age. 29 years, Occ. private Employee, Rr/o. H. No. 2-29, Hamidulla Nagar Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga RedEy District -501 2'18 ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.^.t to 4

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O P.S Malkajgiri, Rep. by public proiecutor High Court, High Court Buildings Hyd.

¶15

2.N . Venkat Rao, S/o. Sri. Laxman, Age. 54 years, Occ. Railway Employee, Rt/o. H.

¶16

No. 13-168, Madhusudhan Nagar, Malkajgiri. Cett No.99S97E394i.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the FIR No. 374 ol 2023 of P.S Malkajgiri for the alteged offences Uls 448, 420, 468, 471 PJw.34 of IPC against the petitioners.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against the Petitioners herein including their arrest in FIR No. 374 ot 2023 ot P.S Malkajgiri.

¶21

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K ASHOK CHAKRAVARTHY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri S. Ganesh, Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No-1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

IION' I] LI.] iNIl'. .II-IS,I.ICE C. ANUPAN{A Ci'In K Ii ^^'A.II.'I}IY

¶24

C tlMINAl. PE'IITION No.66l0 of 2{t2.\

¶25

OITDEIT:

¶26

I ris^('.irninal [)ctilion is lllcd undcr Scction 'tu2^('r.l).C by the pet.it onels/accLrsc-d Nos.l to 4 see.iing tc, qrrash tl're procee(linE.s rn F.l.R.No.374 ol 2023 regist,-'red⁽⁾ⁿ th3 file of the Strtion Ift:luse Olllcer, Matkajgiri l)olic: Stalion, Rirchakonca, firr thc olI'ences punishable urrder lic:tions 4,18, 420, 46|i, 47 rlri Sectitrn 34 o1-lPC.

¶27

I IciLr,J le arucd counsel Ibr the pel.i rons^-:j and Sri S.Grrnesl . lcarned Assistanl Public Prosecut,rr ap,pearirrg fol respondcr t \o.1-Stltc and pcruscd the rer:ord

¶28

Sinr:e tl rc punishmelrt prescribed for th: ofltnces allegcd against Lhe letitioners is less than seven vears, [hir; Ccuft dccrns it itppr .,priate to clircct thc petitioncrs accuiic I J.los.l to 4 to apJrt:ar relbre thc Invesligating O(frcr:r on^(12.()8.2023 bctu,ee n -l:i)(l ['.1\4. atrd^-1:00 I,.\4. The lnv,-'stiuatinq Olficer shall lollori tirc pxrccdrrrc laid dou,n undcl S,:e iolt^-11- A.

¶29

GA('.I Crl P No.6blU ol 202J

¶30

¶31

Cr.P.C. and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar\ scrupulously. However, the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and furnish the information and documents as sought by him in concluding the investigation.

¶32

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶33

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶34

closed

¶35

To,

¶36

Sd/.N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G sEcTtoN oFFtcER

¶37

The Principar Junior civil Judge -cum- Metroporitan Magistrate Medchar at Malkajgiri District at Matkajgiri.

¶38

The Station House Officer, Malkajgiri police Station, Rachakonda.

¶39

One CC to Sri K.Ashok Chakravarthy, Advocate [OpUC]

¶40

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT)

¶41

Two CD Copies

¶42

BJLB

¶43

DL sh"-

¶44

HIGH COURT DATED:2OIO7lit023

¶45

ORDER CRLP.No.6610 of^{2 )23}

¶46

4 I
:
1s Nl$ N8
-,',,
' ;.:^.

¶47

CRIMINAL PETITIO { S^{DISPOSED OF}

¶48

ejlt(;

Smt. N. Mamatha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. N. Mamatha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Batchu Amarnath Vs The State of Telangana

Regula Venkateshwarlu Vs The State of Telangana

Gattu Sreekanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Naresh Mandapuram Vs The State of Telangna

Thouti Nagamani Vs The State of Telangana

Ubbani Rakesh Kumar, Vs State of Telangana