The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 6260 of 2015 for default, noting the lack of representation by the petitioner on multiple dates.
The petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAAAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6260 OF 2015
Between:
1 K.P.Venkateshwar Rao, S/o KP Pandu, Occ: GovtService, Rl/oH.No'42- 478n11, Shiridi Hills, Anjaiah Nagar,Jagadgirigutta, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITION ER/ACCUSED
AND
... RESPONDENT'
-..RESPONDENT'COi,PLAINAI'IT
Petition underSection482 of Cr'P C prayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe Memorandumof Groundsof CriminalPetition'the High Court may bepleased to quash the proceedings in CC No'613of 2013 on the file of Court of Hon'bleXXIV Special Magistrate'Erramanzil' Hyderabad'
P N : 616o 2015 1 F
482 ofCr.P'C prayingthat in the circurflstances Petitionunder Section f Groundsof CriminalPetition'the HighCourt may statedin the Memorandum o in CCNo 613 of 2013 on the file of the ,.,r bepleased to staY all further pecial Magistrate'Erramanzrl' Hyderabad including Courtof the Hon'bleXXIVS ndpresence of the Petitioner' Cross-examinationof Pw-1a
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Aparna Kontham, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri V.Satyam Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
il
I :
I I l I
i j
I I I
TI{T IIONOURABLE SRI.TUSTICE E. V. VEI,TU
GOPAL
c P N No.6260 of 20t5
o RD E R:
The present Crim Section 482 or cr.p.c. seeking,. ,,J:r:'r::_il::":der .C.No.613 of 2Ot3 on the file of the Court of XXIV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Vizarath AIi, learned Assistant public prosecutor appearing for respondent state and Mr.V.Satyam Reddy, Iearned counser for the unolficial respondent.
4 Hence, this Criminal petition is dismissed for default.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sdl- IV. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR IfiRUECOPYII @A
To,
SECTION OFFICER
YIP PI^z.'
N\B
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2410712023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6260of 2015
STATE oA.
q
t')
?B [)B 1$8 A
od .^.
I
'i::-_::---:-:-.-;..
CRIMINALPETITIONIS DISMISSED
P{q t..ttet)3
I
K.P.Venkateshwar Rao
State of Telangana
B.Raiesh Yadav
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
