Dismissed

M/S. Sentini Bio Products (P)Ltd., Hyd and 2 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Telangana HC27 Jun 2023CRLP/6159/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 6159 of 2014 as withdrawn after granting permission to the petitioners, with no objection from the respondent-State. A concurring order dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw dismissed; Criminal Petition withdrawn and dismissed as infructuous.

M/S. Sentini Bio Products (P)Ltd., Hyd and 2 Otrs., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr. — Telangana HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

i I i

i i I I i i

[32ee I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD

¶5

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6159 OF 2014

¶9

Between:

¶10

M/s sentini Bio Products (p)Ltd., rept by its Managing Director lvrs Jaya, having its Regd. Office at Ptot No.1229, Road No.60, Jubitee Hi s, Hyderabad_soo 034

¶11

Ms.Jaya, lrrlanaging Director & Authorised signatory, Ivr/s sentrnr Bio products (p) Ltd., Plot No.1229, Road N0.60, Jubrlee Hi s, Hyderabad-500034

¶12

3 sri Prasad,, GM Finance & Authorised signatory, tvr/s. sentrni Bio products (p) Lrd., Plot No.1229, Road No.60, Jubitee Hi s, Hyderabad_500034

¶13

... PETITIONE RS/ACCUS ED

¶14

AND

¶15

1' The state of Andhra pradesh through station House officer, Jubiree Hirs p.S., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High court ofJudicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and the State of Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶16

M/s.VM COAL LOGTX PRIVATE, LIMITED, A Company incorporated under the provisions of lndian Companies Act, having its Regd. Office at 18, Vt/ Space, MLA & MP Colony, Road No.1OC Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad _ 500033, Andhra pradesh, Rep. by its General Manager-Business Development, Mr.lVIahesh

¶17

..RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petrtion, the High court may be preased to quash the proceedrngs in c.c.No. 90 of 2014 pending on the frre of the xrv special Magistrate at Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶19

¶20

C RLPM P NO:5644 oF 2014

¶21

Petition under se'rtron 4g2 of ci-F,c praying that in the circumstances stated in the [/emorandum of Gr,;unds of Cr n- nal petitron, the Htgh Cor-rrt may be pleased to grant stay of aI further 1-'roceecrngs rncrLrdrng the personar appearance of the petitroner rn cc No 90/2014 on the file of the x v speciar r,agistrate at Erramanzir, Hyderabad Pending disposal of the a 5ove Crl^p

¶22

This Petition con.ti.rg on [or hearnc upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Clminal Petition an(j upon hearin,l the arguments of Srl CH SAA,ISON BABU, Advocate, no representar on on behalf of the petitioner and the pubric prosecuror for the State of Telangana on berhalf of the Re-cp,lndent No 1 and of Sri R.N.REDDy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

{ l

il )

ir I i

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶29

CRIMINAL^{PETITIONNO.6L59 of 2OL4}

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

This Criminal^{Petition is hled to quash the proceedingsin C C'} No.90 of 20 14^{pendingon the hle of XIV Special MagistrateaL} Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶32

When the matter is^{taken-up for hearing, learned counselfor} the petitioners submits^{that the cause inthe present Criminal} Petition does not^{survive for adjudication'} Therefore, no fur[her orders are required^andhence, seeks permission^{of this Court to} withdraw the Criminal^Petition.

¶33

Permission is accorded.

¶34

Learned Assistant^{PublicProsecutorappearingforthe}

¶35

respondent-State^{reportedno objectionfor the same}

¶36

.J Accordingly, the^{Criminal Petition is dismissedas withdrawn'}

¶37

Miscellaneous^{petitions,ifany, pending inthis criminal} petition, shall also^{stand closed.}

¶38

¶39

"f!.!'ilfrY'.?t[?Ht[ 6D

¶40

,ITRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶41

To,

¶42

The XIV^{Special Magistrateat Erramanzil'Hyderabad}

¶43

2 Two.CCs^{to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'High Courtfor theState of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶44

3 One^{CC tO SRI. CHSAMSON BABU, AdVOCAtE[OPUCI} 4 One^{CC to SRI R N REDDY' Advocate [OPUC]} 1 Two^CDCopies

¶45

PP "/'

I i

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2710612023

ORDER

CRLP.No.6159 of 2014

il rlr
{n-' O,i.
)+
i\\ ru5
t-i
!)
\ t,
"-.-Y

DISMISSING THE

CRL.PETITION

AS INFRUCTUOUS

M/S. Sentini Bio Products (P)Ltd., Hyd and 2 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sentini Bio Products (P)Ltd., Hyd and 2 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Agarwal, Vs Kavita Agarwal, and 2 Others

Pola Reddy Sambi Reddy and 2 Ors. Vs Yarka Reddy Anantha Reddy and Ano.

Mohd Riyazuddin Vs Nasreen Fatima and Another

Sadaboina Venkat Narayana, Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Mr.Gautam Bhagat and Others Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

K.Adinarayana Rao Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another