Dismissed

Be-Am Infra Equipments Private Limited and Another v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC21 Mar 2023CRLP/5913/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal petition seeking quashing of supersedeas proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court held that the petitioners must undergo trial to prove their defence and therefore dismissed the petition without grounds observed for quashing.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; proceedings to be continued by thrial Court.

Be-Am Infra Equipments Private Limited and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32sl ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMI NAL PETITION NO: 5913 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

BE-AM lnfra Equipments Private Limited, rep by^{its Proprie^tor} ^Cu.m Authorised Signa[ory Venkateshwarlu Kunchala^{S/o Ankamma,25-321101412'} Mallikarjun N-agar'Beeramguda kaman, R.C.Puram^{SangareddyDistrict} Telangana

¶9

Venkateshwarlu Kunchala, S/o Ankamma^{Aged about 32 yeats Occ. Business} Sangareddy District Telangana^R/o Villa^{No.130, Sri Mytri Villas Kistareddypet} Village Ameenpur Mandal Sangareddy District Telangana^State

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED^No.1 &2

¶11

AND

¶12

I The State of Telangana, rep. by^its Public^{Prosecutor, High Court,Hyderabad} 2 Mr Anka Rao Tammrsetty, S/o^{Anka Rao Tammisetty aged about 40 years} Occ.Pvt Employee R/o Plot No 22 NRI^{KSR Anand Nagar Near.Bach pan} School Beeiamguda Ameenpur Mandal^{Sangareddy DistrictTelanganaState}

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/GOMPLAI NANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the HighCourt may be} pleased to call for the records relating to the complaint in STC.No.16^{of 2022 on} the file of the Judicial First-Class^{Magistrate Cum Spl Excise Court, Sangareddyat} Sangareddy, Sangareddy District^{and to quashthe proceedings thereon, and to} grant

¶15

This Petition coming on for^{hearing,uponperusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MANDA} ADAM, Advocate for the Petitioner^{and of the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the state} of Telangana on behalf of lhe^{RespondentNo.1and None appeared for the} Respondent No.2

¶16

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶17

¶18

THE: t ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SUIIFNDER

¶19

EJ^{IIMINAL PETITION} No.5913 of I^to22

¶20

ORDEB

¶21

This Cr ninal Petition is filed under Section 482 rtf the Code of Criminal Frc:edure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') t:t rluash the proceed ngs rr STC No.16 of 2022 pending on the^rile of learned ludicial Mac strate of First Class-cum-Special I :xcise Court, SangareCdl,D strict.

¶22

Hr:ard :arned counsel for the petitioners/A-1 anri A-2 and learned Acldi ional Public Prosecutor for the resg:ondent-State. Perused the'n cord.

¶23

On per sal of the facts and circumstances of _he case, the petitioners/A- and A-2 have to undergo the trial trt prove their defence and the same cannot be considered k, cuash the proceedi,rgs.

¶24

AccorCir gly, there are no grounds and the Crirnital^petition is dismissed. [t the event of the petitioners/A-l anj A-2 filing an application ur ler Section 205 of Cr.P.C., to be reltr tserrted by a

¶25

¶26

counsel, the same^{shall be consideredby the trial Court without}

¶27

hindrance to the trial.

¶28

Mirellaneous applications^{pending, if any, shall stand closed'} SD'- MOHD. SANAULLAH^ANSARI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

SECTIO FFICER

¶31

To, 1 The Judicial First^{class Magistrate cumSpl_Excise court at sangareddy} 2 o"" CC tJ snl.^{MANDAAbAM Advocate [oPUC]} 3 i*. ccrL^{FuBLtcpRosECUTOR,High courtfor the Stateof Telangana} at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶32

Two CD Copies KKS

Bsq

HIGH COURI

DATED:21103t2023

'*t-l <br>,/
/ 1.1 <br>dF
t-
ll ts' ,l
I
t.
\t.i

¶37

ORDER

¶38

CRLP.No 5913 ot 2022

¶39

DISPOSING^{( IF} THE CRLP

¶40

,-L GsF,r t€,,t,1-t^-

Be-Am Infra Equipments Private Limited and Another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Be-Am Infra Equipments Private Limited and Another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janga Raghava Reddy Vs Thangellapally Sammaiah and Another

Sreenidhi Townships Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana and Another

G Surendar , Surender Amba Das Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Ibrahim Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Vuppala Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Telangana And Another

Mohd Abdul Rawoof , Mohammed Abdul Rauf, And 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And Another