N.Prabhakar Reddy v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings was dismissed as infructuous since the matter had become sub judice before a Lok Adalat.
A criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings was dismissed as infructuous since the matter had become sub judice before a Lok Adalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t320e l
trL
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITIONJ.lO: s309 OF 2018
Between:
N.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o.N.Venkat Reddy, Rl/o D.No. 2-2-18119, Ftat No.102, Sai Annapurana Apartments, DD Colony, Hyderabad
...PETITION ER/ACCUSED
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FlR.No.14O of 2017 on the file of pS Madhapur and pleased to pass such other and further orderis in the interest of justice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of FlR.No.140 ol 2017 on the file of PS Madhapur.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in FlR.No.'140 of 2O17 on the file of PS Madhapur and be pleased to pass such other order or orders in the interest ofjustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VIVEK JAIN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court iade the following: ORDER
t
t'L
HON'ELE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUIITALATI{A {:-CRIMINAL PETITION No.53O9 of 2(o18
ORDER:
To
Sd/.P.PADI/AI'JABHA REDDY ASSIS;'] ANT REGISTRAR
sha-Il stand :losed.
//TRUE COPYII
:JI=CTION OFFICER
K) ,1
\ \
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210212023
ORDER
CRLP.No.5309 of2C18
-1:
,r:i,,1; S I-q)-S :-..:.-
ar \ -. '<br>I -t
/, u'
li il 2B iii 2pl
i'' -,
,. ",..
THE CRL.P. IS DISM SSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
A
<br>L pltl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Prabhakar Reddy
State of Telangana
Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court