High Court at Telangana dismissed a criminal petition filed by the State seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to three accused persons. The Court held that no new facts were projected to justify interference.
The Criminal Petition under section 439(2) of CrPC seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OFFEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICECHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 417 OF2023
Between:
The State of Telangana, through the StationHouse Officer, SiddipetI TownP S, Represented by TFe AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, High Courtfor the State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500066
... Petitioner/Respondent
AND
...Respondents/AccusedNos. 2 to 4
Petition under section 439(2) of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminalPetition,the Highcourt may be pleased to cancel the antictpatorybail granted to the Respondents/Accused No.2 to 4 vide Orders daled 29-12-2022passed by the Principal Districtand Sessions Judge at Siddipetin Crl.MP.No.50612022 in Cr.No 46312022-
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition anduponhearing the argumentsof Public Prosecutor, Advocatefor the Petitroner and the Sri. C SHARANREDDY' Advocate on behalf of the Respondents.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HOt{fBLg Dr. JUSTICECHILLAKURSUMAL{THA
(:RIIVTINAL PETITION No.417 o 2023
ORDER:
Heard tl rele arnedAdditional Publicl)rose:t.ttotwho is representingt ee petitioner-State.
)
Dr CSL. J Crl. P. No.4l7 of 2023
Prosecutor is not that the Sessions Court rendered the impugned order without hearing the public prosecutor present there.
\
To,
SdI-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANTREGISTRAR dt SECTIONOFFICER
//TRUECOPY//
1 The PrincipalDistrict and SessronsJudge at Siddtp^et'. The StationHouse Officer, SiJo'p"t riJ*" Police Stalion' Siddipet District 3 i;;A; noJition"tpuoticFiosec'tor'Highcourt for the State of Telanoana. atHYderabad [OUTI 4 dnE i;il;Ri''c-iHnnAr'rREDDY AdvocatetoPUCl 6 Two CD CoPies
PSR
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210212023
J.
'?
,
(r ('
S"
.".,
c
s\ l,/
ORDER
CRLP.No.41i' ol 2023
THE CR!MINI,L PETITION IS DISMISSED. @*Pro gD---: ,\A?'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under section 439(2) of CrPC for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondents should be allowed.
Whether any new facts or justifiable grounds exist to interfere with the order of anticipatory bail passed by the Sessions Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Telangana
Mohd Karim Pasha
Zohara Jabeen
Mohd. ParazAhmed
Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
