A criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners had already been discharged in the trial court order dated 19.07.2016. Both counsel agreed with the dismissal.
Criminal Petition No. 13975 of 2015 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE }IIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA , ATHYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
cRr MINAL PETITION NO: 13975OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 &2
AND
The State Of Telangana.,Rep.by Public prosecutor through Assistant Commissioner(Legal Prosecution)Customs, Commissionarate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad High Court atHyderabadfor the States of T.S
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition, the HighCourt may be pleased toquash theproceedingsin C.C No.6 of 2015 on the file of the Honble Special Judge for Economic Offences,Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 13856 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in thecircumslances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petltion' the HighCourt may be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings in C.C.No.6of 2015on the file of the Hon'ble Special Judge for EconomicOffences, Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on forhearing,upon perusingthe Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition andupon hearing the argumentsof Sri Nageshwara Rao Pappu ,Advocate for thePetitioner and Sri ARamakrishnaReddy (SC for CBEC) and Sri Vizarath AIi Assistant Publicprosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following:ORDER
r''
I
t t,
t
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13975 oF2015
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is frled seeking toquashthe proceedings against the petitioners/ accusedNos. 1 and 2in C.C.No.6 of 2015 on the hle of the learnedSpecial Judgefor Economic Offences, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial Court")for the offences punishable under Section135(1)(a) &(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.
2
MiscellaneousPetitions, pendingif any' shall stand closed'
SD/. V.KAVITHA
ASSISTANT BEQISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
/
SECTIONOFFICER
AR
$>
HIGH COURT
DATED:.2411112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.13975 of 2015
{ s€ STA r 6'
P
C)
g 29 JAN 2024
.1
.,,.i..,
S ir,1. i
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
,9' ?'\ 1r+l
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings is maintainable when the accused has already been discharged in the trial court.
Waseem Ahmed
Mrs. Hajeera Begum
The State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
