The High Court of Telangana allowed the appellant's civil miscellaneous appeal to be withdrawn by permission. The appeal filed against Railway Claims Tribunal orders was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I3383 I
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMINARAYANA ALISHETTY
CIVIL M{SCE LLANEOUS APPEALNO:162OF2022
Appeal Under Section 23 RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987' againstthe orders dt.11-1-2022 in R.P No.16/2021in O.AAIl (U) No.89/2004 which forms part and parcel of the impugnedjudgment dl.3ol7l2O21in OAA ll(U)No.89/2004.
Between:
Union of lndia, rep. by its GeneralManager,South Central Railway, Secunderabad.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
All R/o. Marripalem village,Nagayalanka Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh
...RESPONDENTS
tA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 15'l CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order d1.11-1-2022in R P No.16/m21in O.A.A 11(U) No.89/2004which forms part andparcel of theimpugnedjudgment dt3O-7-2O21in OA ll(U) No' 8gt2OO4 passed by Railway ClaimsTribunal Secunderabad Benchpending disposal of the appeal.
NO:3O 2022
BETWEEN
1 . M-Rambabu, S/o. Late Pasupathi Rao (died on 26-7 -2012)
4llR/o.. Manipalem village, Nagayalanka Mandat, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh
PetitionersiRespondents
And
Union of lndia, rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad.
Respondents/petitioners
Petition under section'r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in.support of the petition, itre High court may be preased to vacate lnterim stay order dated o1_o4_2o22ln cMn .No. 162 of 2022.
Counsel for the Appettant(s):SRt. ANJALT AGARWAL
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following: ORDER
ll
THE HON'BLE SRI .'USTICE LAXMI NAR.E.YANA ALISHETTY
C.M.A.No.162 of 2022
JTJDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing,learned counselfor the appellant seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the present appeal.
shall be no order as to costs.
closed.
SD/. K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REG]STRAR
/TTRUECOPY//
SECTTONOFFICER
To
i, H:H n s*I3#:l;l:*lftrr:ii?"'Hf1:{'"'
i!
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810112024
ORDER
CMA.No.162 of 2022
(
i,
2 g FtB 2024 lt
Jo{, )> it
at
osspltc
OISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Prlr''l"
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India, rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad
M. Rambabu
M. Durgaprasad
M. Sarada
M. Dileep
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
