The High Court in Telangana closed a filed Criminal Revision Case (CRLRC.No. 437 of 2010) following the submission of a joint compromise memo by the petitioner-accused and the respondent-complainant regarding settlement of dues.
Criminal Revision Case closed and all pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
FRIDAY,THE TWEN'TY FIITSI DAY OF APRIL TWO |HOUSAND AND TWENI'Y'THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT IUSTICEP.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NQ:437 OF2010
Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of CrPC, aggrieved by thc conviction recorded in the Judgment dated 09-12-2009 made in CC.No.238 of2008 on the file of the XVI Addl. |udge-cum-XXl A.C.M.M., Hyderabad and as confirmed and recorded in the |udgment dt. 02-03-2010 Crl.A.No. 1,4 of 2O1,0 by the Special fudgefor Economic Offences-cum- VIII Adtlitional Metropolitan Sessions ludge,at Hyderabad.
Between:
M. Sridhar Rao,,S/o M. Srinir.as Rao, Business, Plot No.28, SBH Colony, Behind DBR Mills, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyclerabacl
...PETTTTONETVACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDEI\ryCOMPLAINANT
LA. NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP. NO:535 OF 2010)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed in Judgment dt. 09-72-2009 in CC.No. 238 of 20O8 by the XVI Addl. Judge-cum- XX A.C.M.M., Hyderabad and as confirmed and recorded in the fudgment d,t. 2-3-20L0 in Crl.A.No. 14 of 2010 by the SpI. Judge for Economic Offences -cum-VIII Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. CHALLA GUNARANJAN Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. AADESH VARMA The Court made the following: ORDER
.IIIE HONOIJRABI,F, SMT. .'USTICE P. SRT-E ST]DHA
('RIl\llNn l- RLI ISION CASti No.4i7 ol'20r0
ORDIiR:
['his c]rirrinul Re'isio, ('.se is filed by rhe petitioncr accused aclLricrcd b1 thc.judgmcnt ol corrr iLrion datcd 01.0-l l0l0 in ( rirrrinal Appcal No.l-1 o1'2010 passecl by thc' Special Judge fbr Economic Oflfcnccs-cum -VIll Additional Metropolitan Sessions .ludge, tJyderabad, confirrr.ring the judgment tlated 09. 11.2009 in C--.C.No.2i8 ol'1008 passcd by XVI Additional Jud{r.e cunr XX Adciitionel ( hic1'Metropolitrrn Magistratc, tlyderahad
L I he lcarned counsel lor the petitioner and thc learned counsel litr l'cspotttlctlt ptescttt. l-he petitiorcl uceused anrl [hc responllcnL coilplainanL appcar.ed befbre this Clourt and rhe),arc identifred by their respecrive counsel on rccord.'lhe parlies have also filed a Joint Compromise Memo. [t was reported that the petitioner-accLrsed paid rn arrount ol Rs.50,000/- (ltupecs Fitiy Thousand only) to the respondent-complainant towards flll and f-rnal settlement of the dues and tlrere \vele no clairns against each other.
Miscellaneous pctitions pcnding, if any, shalt stand closed.
sd/-r. NAGA LAKSHMT DEPUTY REGISTRAR lfrRuECoPy// r/ ,l 1t--
To,
SECTION OFFICER
1 *:,:ffi fl ;:,'fi;:'"::r':J:-ic offe,ccs -cum- vrrr Additionar Metroporiran
'- u^A
I I ! i I t I
CHG
kam
PntC,.,
HIGH COURT DATED:21./04/2023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.437 of 2010
:IAI c ,:-t
t: lltt 2m
[5 ']
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS CLOSED
PF\O, \s<sup>9 \o3'
M. Sridhar Rao
State of Andhra Pradesh
P. Jagan Mohan Reddy
Justice P. Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
