Dismissed

Bibin Prashad,Narsing Prashad and Another v. Smt.Anasuya and 17 Others

Telangana HC20 Apr 2023CCCA/327/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a City Civil Court Appeal (No. 327 of 2018) filed under Section 96 of CPC for default due to the non-appearance of the appellants and their counsel on the date of hearing.

What did the court decide?

The City Civil Court Appeal No. 327 of 2018 is dismissed for default, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2016 passed in O.S.No.2284 of 2008.

Bibin Prashad,Narsing Prashad and Another Vs… — Execution and Attachment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶5

CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 327 OF 2018

¶6

Appeal filed Under Section 96 of CPC aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated. 12-02-2016 passed in O.S.No.2284 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bibin Prashad @^{Narsing Prashad, S/o.Late. Mahaveer Prasad,aged44} years, Occ. Business, Wo.14-1178411, Nayeebasti, Beerban Bagh, Hyderabad.

¶9

Santosh Kumar, S/o. Late. Mahaveer Prashad aged about 40 years, Occ.Serivce, Fi/o 14-11-78411, Nayeebasti, Beerban Bagh, Hyderabad

¶10

...Appellants/Defendant No.14 and't5

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Smt. Anasuya, Wio. Venkatesham, aged about 65 years, Occ.Housewife, N o.1 8-5-7 22, Mekalbanda, Outside Laldawaza, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 Smt. B.Suguna, Wo. Buchaiah, aged about 62 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o 12-1-45, Old Mallepally, Hyderabad. (Died) per L.R.'s R-3 and 4 herein)

¶14

J Ramesh, S/o. Buchaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ. Business,

¶15

Mahesh, S/o. Buchaiah aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, Both Rl/o. 12-145, Old Mallepally, Hyderabad.

¶16

Smt. Vasantha, W/o. Yadagiri, aged about 40 years, Occ.Housewife, Rlo. 1411-785, Gode ki kabar, Shahinayath gunj, Kothabasti, Hyderabad. (Died) per L.R.'s R-15 to R-17 herein)

¶17

Smt. D.Lalitha @ Umadevi, W/o. Surender, aged about 35^yeais, Occ. Housewife, N o. 17 -2-31 4/1 /A,/1, Pbolathotha, Madannapet, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

¶18

Vijayalaxmi, W/o. Laxman, aged about 45 years, Occ.Housewife, Rlo. 12-12661N1 , Kummarwadi, Asifnagar, Hyderabad.

¶19

E.Srinivas Rao, S/o. Komraiah, aged about 48 years, Occ. Courier Boy, FYo.6-10-27l4,Shivarampally Weaker Section Colony, Ranga Reddy District

¶20

S.Padma, Wo. S.Mdralidhar Rao aged about 40 years, Occ.Housewife, R./o. 5-33/2, Devunipally, Nizam Kamareddy, Nizamabad District, Sagar Road,

¶21

.I i l i I I i I I

¶22

Satish KLtnr:rr :l .). Vitflesl-. aoed ;rlroul 35 years.⁽ )56^.-r' r lle Servr^e R7o

¶23

18-8-302'A, lrr 3 B,,s d,: Nl ', r poulr, rrnmagud Iaqa r Na,7:r- LJprug.Lca Hyde ra b;rd .

¶24

11 Baby @-^r.:'llJra ra W/o. Srrranrulu, :rged about 33 yt:ar:;, (rcr;. Housewife, R/o.18-8 )O:Ztt^t'218, Besice Nallapochamma gudi, Tanali l,lag,rr, Uppuguda, Hyderab;rd

¶25

12.Santosh. 3/o. l4afesh, aged about 31 years, Occ. Elusrnels, Ric. 1g_g302lAl12tB, Br sirle N,;llapochamma gudi, Tanaji N;rgar, [/p ]uguda, Hydera bad.

¶26

13 lVayur, Sr: Vi llr,sh, ag-ed about 26 years, Occ.pvt Emplryee, R/o.^.lB-g_ 302lAl12tB, Be sirle Nallapochamma Tanaji Nagar, Jppigu, ia,'llyderabad

¶27

14.Renuka, !V/o. l;t,/aiah aged about 22yearc, Occ.H,tusewifc, R,o. 16_g_ 30214112t3, Be sirle N;allapochamma glrdi, Tanajj Nagar, ltp ruguda, Hyderaba C .

¶28

l5.Yadagrri 31411lAl' iS/c,. Pco r athota ot known aged Madannapeta, about 4Z Sjidabad, years, Occ Hyderabrci. Busire,;s, ' l7lo. 17_2-

¶29

16 papy 9onr, [)ic Yadalliri, aged about 17 yearc, Occ Stud3r.t, Fto. 1t_2_ 31411lAl', P:o athota lr,,4ad a nna peta, Saidabad, Hyderabld.'

¶30

17.Master R.rkcsr s;/o^yadagrri. aged about 16 years Occ. S.udr nl,Rro.1l-2_ 314l1lAl1 Pro alhota Madannapeta, Saidabdd, UyAeraO rct,

¶31

Pradeep.Kurna , l/o.^L_ate lvlahaveer prasad, aged about 3(_ years, Occ. pvt. Service, t-'.lo 1t...1-785, Nayeebasti, Beerban a"agn Hyoe izioii.^{-' --- "}

¶32

(Responcl-.nts J.^.10 t,t 14 are not necessary parties to tnis,\ppeal as they are set expale in the rnain surt)

¶33

... Respondents/Defendant s lrlo. I to 13 and'16

¶34

Counsel for the App, rllants: SRl. AAKULA MANIK PRABHU ( rJr:r representation)

¶35

Counsel for the Resl ,ondents: SRI K. BHARATI DEVI

¶36

The Court made the 'otlowing: ORDER

¶37

¶38

I'llI'. llOYl][-I._ Dr.,tt]S't't('U (i. It.\t)HA It,\NI (ll] \ ('t\ til. (()t,RIA l)PIiAI- No. -r27 ()F 20 t8

¶39

.lt IXit{E\1':

¶40

Ilir: ('it_i ( rr il ( oLrrt AJrpcal is lilecl b1,. rhc. appc.ll:rnrs

¶41

ticicntlant \rrs | -l trnri I i lr:tgr.rrt,ccl itr the .jucl_urnertr rirrurl ll,0l.l0lb passcd in ().S \o.ll.ll ol'1008 by thc I Senior Civil Juclge. City (.ivil ('t,rurr. Ilr d clu harl.

¶42

l. \'hcrr thc rlaitcr cirrrc Llp lbr hcar.ing op 24.0j.202.1, [hcrc rvas no rcprc'Scnr&rion b) rhc rea;ned counsei ror the appellants as welr as thc ic:tlttccl c<;trrr.ci lirr tlrc t.csponc.lents. The rnatter u,as posted to 15 0'l -l()ll .rrrlcr trrc .irl)rr(,ir lirr riisrrrrssar'. rivcn Lodar also. LhoLrtrr thc rnatter is postcd undcr tlrc caption ,lor dismissal,. therc is no reprcscutallon bv Iearnctj co,_rnscl Ibr appellants.

¶43

Ilcncc. thc ( .( .C.,. is disrnissed lirr detault, conlirming lhc_

¶44

-iLrrigrrrenl^{d^red 12.0r.10r6} passed in o.S.No.22g4 or'200g by the I Ssnio!-('ivrl .lirtiuc. ( irr ( ir.il (.orrr-i. I.lvderabrld.

¶45

//TRUE COPY//

¶46

Sd/. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR JOINT REGISTRAR q

¶47

SECTION OFFICER

¶48

To, 1. The I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to SRI AAKULA MANIK PRABHU,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶49

One CC to Smt KOMMINENI BHARATI DEVI,^Advocate [OPUCI

¶50

Two CD Copies MMK

¶51

kam

¶52

OV(

¶53

HIGH COURT DATED:2O10412.02:\

¶54

ORDER

¶55

CCCA.No.327 of 20' I

¶56

).r'
/ a<br><br>/i
lir\i 1t?3
71
\i
7/

¶57

DISMISSING T {E C.C.C.A. FOR DEFAULT

¶58

Bibin Prashad,Narsing Prashad and Another v. Smt.Anasuya and 17 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bibin Prashad,Narsing Prashad and Another v. Smt.Anasuya and 17 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Raj Kumari Vs Dr. K. Sudha

Smt. Raj Kumari Vs Dr. K. Sudha

Mohd. Ahmed, Hyd Vs Mohd. Usman, Hyd

Mrs. Delphine Stracey Vs Smt. Santosh Murlidhar

St. Thomas (Spg) Tamil Church Society, Vs The Church of South India Trust Association (Csita)

St. Thomas (Spg) Tamil Church Society Vs the Church of South India Trust Association (Csita)