A contempt case regarding wilful disobedience of orders was closed as respondents complied with the directives, despite petitioner disputing gratuity disbursement; case could be reopened if amounts remain unpaid.
Closed contempt case; petitioner allowed to revive proceedings if amounts not disbursed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 988 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for wilfully and violating the Orders of the High Court daled 1011012022 passed in W.A.No. 601 OF 2022. Between:
S- Triveni, Wo. T Vishnu Prasad, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Retd. Lecturer, Kamala Nehru Polytechnic for Women, Rio. H.No.1-98/8, plot No.14, Arunodaya Colony, Madhapur, Hyderabad - 500081 (As per order) Presently residing at Flat No.710, K-Block, Jains Carlton Creek, Khajaguda, Raidurgam, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 't OF 2023
Petition under Section,l51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the gratuity along with interest to the petitioner pending disposal of the Contempt Case
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. KALYANA RAMA KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: NONE APPEARED
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: GP FOR SERVICES-I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SIIRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND I{ON'BLB SHRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESIIWAR RAO C.C.No.988 of 2023
ORDER: ('rr Ho n'bh .li Jrnie ,4bhiaand Kmar Slut,i/i)
This contempt case is filed complaining wilful disobedience on the paft of the responden$ in implementing the order dated 10.10.2022 p,rsscd by this C-ourt in I.ANo.2 of 2022 in V.ANo.60l of 2022.
\I{hen the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 had informed this C-our-t that the respondents have complied with the order dated 10.10.2022 passed by this C-ourt in I.ANo.2 of. 2022 n V.ANo.601 of 2022 and to that effect proceedings dated 19.10.2023 have been issued.
2
I I
kamed counsel appearing for the petitioner does
not dispure the said fact, however, contended that
\
\
gratuityamounr is yet to be disbuned.
In view of the same, rhe Contempt Case is closed.
However, if the amounts are nor disbursed, the petitioner
is at liberqrto revive the contempt case.
Miscellaneous peritions,'{ any, pending shall stand
closed.
Sd/- B, SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REG TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1. Smt. Karuna Vakati,, Principal Secretary, The Government of Telangana, Technical Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana
KVR/VH ".y
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1811112023
ORDER
E STA r€
/q I
oo 0 5 t[B 2[2[
(
*
\ .r+ *
SP1.TC
CC.No.988 of 2023
CLOSING THE CC
(9/-r'<br>j<br>
S. Triveni
Karuna Vakati
A. Pullaiah
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
