Court closed a long-pending contempt case for lack of petitioner interest and directed closure of incidental petitions, granting liberty for fresh applications if necessary.
Contempt Case closed; incidental petitions closed; liberty to move fresh application if contempt survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.960 of 2013
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.5996 of 2009 dated 26.11.2012.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. On 17.11.2022 also, there is no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. The present Contempt Case is filed in the year 2013 and it was not admitted so far. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this Contempt Case.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh application, still if any, contempt survives.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Date: 23-01-2023 ssm
Petitioner
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
