In a filed Contempt Case alleging violation of a prior order, the Court noted the absence of petitioner's representation across multiple hearings and the delay in admission, concluding the petitioner lacks interest. Consequently, the Contempt Case was closed.
Contempt Case No.2091 of 2012 is closed; liberty to fresh application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.2091 of 2012
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.16685 of 2007 dated 25.06.2008.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. On 17.11.2022 and 23.11.2022 also, there is no representation for the petitioner. The present Contempt Case is filed in the year 2012 and it is not admitted so far. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this Contempt Case.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the
petitioner is at liberty to move a fresh application, if the contempt still survives.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Date: 23-01-2023 Prv
Petitioner
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
