Pothula Krishna Reddy v. Smt. Shaik Yasmeen Basha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Telangana accepted the submission of the Additional Advocate General that Respondent No. 2 need not be present for the current hearing in Contempt Case No. 361 of 2022 and dispensed with their presence. The matter was listed for 16.06.2023.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WE,DNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JL]NE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 361 OF 2022 /
Between:
P, Rajeev, S/o. P. Buchibabu, Aged 4l years, Occ: Joint Director, O/o. Director, School Education, R/o. Flat No. 102, Chetan Residency, Nizampet, Bachupally Mandal, MedchalMalkaj giri District-5 00090.
Petitioner
AND
- l. Sandeep Kumar Sultania, Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, School Education Department, S ecretariat, S ai fabad, Hyderabad.
- Smt. A. Sridevasena, The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
Respondents
WHEREAS the petitioner has presented the Contempt Case under Sections l0 to 12 of tire Contempt of Courts Ac! 1971, through his counsel Sri Avadesh Narayan Sanghi, praying the High Court to summon the respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of tlre orders passed in I.A. No.l of 2021 in WP. No. 18466 of 2021, dated 10-08-2021;
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Rajeev
- respondent
1. Sandeep Kumar Sultania
- respondent
2. Smt. A. Sridevasena
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/361/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court