Sri. Tatiparthi John Prakash, v. Ms. Chandrakala
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding concerning the 2016 order directing demarcation of the petitioner's land, the Court concluded that no disobedience occurred because the specific land was evacuee property vested with the Government. The Court closed the case, advising the petitioner to seek remedies against the relevant dismissal memo.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the memo dated 18.06.2016.
What the court decided
'llq
. IN THEHIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABADTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYTHREE
ffi.-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
c NTE PTC ENO 2334 F20
1971 lo Contemptpunish casethe ,..ponA.ni" filedunder Sections 10 herein for willful lo 12 disobedience of Contempt of of Courts theorders.Act '1t,. Ori.i i1.b+.ior6 passedin W.P.No1411 412016by this Hon'ble HighCourt'
Between:
Sri. Tatioarthi John Prakash, S/o. Prakasam, aged abou-t 59 years' Occ Social
W;r#,'"Rv;.'i - i - + tii r'rtiridipalem, onsole, Piakasam District'
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER iiffi
AND
l.Ms.Chandrakala,D/o.NotKnown,Tahsildar,shaikpetMandal'Hyderabad
District.
2. Mr. Gnaneswar, S/o. Not Known, Mandal Surveyor, Shaikpet Mandal'
Hyderabad District.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NO.3&4
lN WP.No'141lrt/2016'
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. P. SRINIVAS, Advocate
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (TG)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should punish the respondents for willful disobedience of a direction to demarcate the petitioner's land as the land was found to be evacuee property vested with the Government.
If the petitioner's application for demarcation required adjudication regarding the ownership of the specific land plot.
What remedy is available to the petitioner against the memo dated 18.06.2016 dismissing the demarcation request.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tatioarthi John Prakash
- respondent
Chandrakala
Coram
J. Sreenivas Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/2334/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court